|
|
|
|
|
Pretec
Compact Flash GPS Card Review |
15th September
2002 |
|
Review by Dave Burrows
http://www.pretec.com
Introduction
The Pretec Compact Flash GPS Card isn't a new card
on the block, but Pretec is a name that is respected across mobile devices and
mobile storage solutions so we thought it would be a good idea to see if we
could get a review copy.
Pretec currently offer the CF GPS Card and the CF
GPS LP Card (latter being Low Power Consumption). We could only get our
hands on the normal power consumption card for this review.
Although the Pretec card is a CF Type I card it is
about 1cm longer than a standard CF card which means the head or antenna in the
Pretec extends well past the top of the Pocket PC causing a gap. We
suspect the Pretec was created like this to make sure it gives enough clearance
in most laptops, but does make the GPS card look unsightly when coupled with the
Pocket PC, and also gives it a weakness if it were to drop from a windscreen
mount. The Pretec card does fit easily into a CF card socket or sleeve, or
into a PCMCIA card adapter.
Initial Findings and Installation Problems
Before opening the box there's a large white
sticker plastered over the box that says "If you experience any problems
with the Pretec Installation CD you can download the latest GPSDEMO.EXE & Quick
Installation Guide from the following.
ftp://coneguest:@ftp.c1tech.com.tw/FAE_Support"
Needless to say I tried the CD, the installation instructions are in PDF format
and no paper ones (apart from a couple of screen shots), and these PDF files
were corrupted. The GPS Demo executable to test the card on the Pocket PC
was also corrupted. I tried downloading from the site suggested, but at
about 1 byte every 60 seconds on a 4mb internet connection, it kept timing out.
In the end I located a copy of each at the US Pretec.com site. I'm not
entirely sure why they suggest you use c1tech.com.tw, but it certainly didn't work
in this case, which might foil the average user!
The Pretec comes bundled with AutoRoute
2002/Pocket Streets, Portable Guide (a US mapping program) and also TomTom City
Maps.
Already having TomTom Navigator software I decided
to test the Pretec with my current software work horse, and without having to
install any Pretec or third party drivers all I had to do was insert the card,
load TomTom Navigator, select the Pretec CF GPS Card and it entered it's
acquisition mode, so I probably didn't require the manuals anyway.
|
Pretec CF GPS Card
iPAQ, Pretec CF GPS Card inserted
into a Dual PC Card sleeve and
attached to an Arkon CM656
Multimedia and Windscreen
mount. |
Pretec CF GPS Card in action
attempting it's first acquisition
|
GPS Testing
In the initial preview I tested the
Pretec on my iPAQ 3850 with a Dual PC Card Sleeve on an Arkon CM656
Multimedia mount, but have since switched to a Compact Flash Card
Sleeve using an SD card in the iPAQ 3850 as the storage to support the
mapping products and this works very well. One thing Pretec have
forgotten about and that's a cradle to let your Pocket PC sit in.
Without this, you will be looking at the extra cost of a cradle mount
either windscreen or air vent and this will
increase the total cost by another
£30-50 depending on the mount you buy.
Average time to TTFF on a cold start (8+
hours) is approx 33 seconds, the Pretec card does have problems with signal, the
built in antenna does not seem quite as powerful as say the Navman GPS
3000 sleeve antenna, and you do find the signal strength fluctuating,
sometimes it will be receiving as many satellite fixes as the Navman,
and other times it will be 2-3 less. Because of this, you do
lose signal quite quickly when going under light tree cover, but the
Pretec has a good re-acquisition time at around 3 seconds, so this really
isn't too much of a problem, just a minor nuisance.
I've been running both the Navman GPS
3000 sleeve and the Pretec card side by side in the car now for about
three weeks, and running various applications on both units to compare them.
In most, I've found voice navigation is slightly off, probably due to
the lower satellite fixes on the Pretec with the built in antenna, and this is
probably one of the reasons why Pretec are also offering a magnetic
antenna as an optional extra for this unit. They did forget one
thing though, and most people would probably want to fix this to the
dashboard, and most dashboards are plastic, and there's no double
sided sticky tape which is a shame, but you can pick some up at your
local stationary store. The Pretec does come with a belt wallet
which is a welcomed edition!
I must say that the Pretec has been a
dream to use. I regularly get strange occurrences on the Navman
GPS 3000 where it won't acquire a fix, or sometimes has lost fix and
won't re-acquire, the Pretec hasn't had any of these problems under
testing.
|
Drivers
What drivers am I using ? I've
been using the drivers (1.36) from TomTom, with Navigator and these
work perfectly. I've also used the built in Destinator drivers
too, and again had no problems.
Cosmetics
The unit has been an utter dream to use,
and if it weren't for the cosmetics (the ugly gap between the CF Card
and the antenna), and the extra height it adds to the Pocket PC, I
would probably retire my trusty Navman for this unit.
This is how much faith I've managed to put in it over the past week's
of testing.
From now on I will be running at least two Pocket
GPS units permanently in car, which will give me added testing
abilities of comparing GPS maps and software.
|
You'll see from the photo below the
extra size the Pretec GPS adds to the Pocket PC compared to the new
TomTom Navigator GPS receiver. If you have the space and also
want to be able to take it with you walking or even use it in a laptop
then the Pretec CF GPS Receiver is probably for you. Most of the
new GPS Receivers hitting the market are now external square
block receivers which really isn't a portable solution.
One thing also to note is
that Pretec have just brought out a newer CF GPS Card that I mentioned
at the beginning of the review called the Pretec LP (LP stands for Low
Power Consumption). In the testing I didn't find the Pretec
drain any more power than any regular GPS Receiver. Most GPS
Receivers are heavy on the Pocket PC battery, and are best powered
from constant car battery power, so the LP version could be a good
move forward in technology.
Casio E125 with Pretec CF GPS
Receiver and an iPAQ 3850 with TomTom Navigator |
Pretec Antenna
For the past two weeks I've been spending
quality time testing the Pretec extra add-on Pretec Antenna for the Pretec GPS Card,
and I must say I'm impressed.
The antenna itself is a small square
block of a couple of inches in length/width and is attached to a 16ft
cable which allows you to put this antenna virtually anywhere in the
car! The signal strength I have been receiving on the Pretec CF
GPS Card has increased
by around 2 sats since using the external antenna, and it's only
sitting on the dashboard and not on the exterior of the car in any
way. This actually brings the Pretec card on par now with the Navman
GPS 3000 in terms of signal strength and in most cases it excels the Navman for signal strength
and reliability.
|
|
You do however still lose signal
sometimes going through heavy tree coverage, but in most cases I've
found the Navman losing signal strength before the Pretec, and as the Navman has
a slower re-acquisition time of around 5-7 mins whilst driving, the
Pretec also excelled with it's 3 sec re-acquisition time providing
unparalleled driving ability allowing me to concentrate more on the
road than on the Pocket PC.
If Pretec had taken the initiative to
include the external antenna and also a cheap to moderate universal
windscreen mount and cradle, then I would have no problem in
recommending this unit to our readers. Because of this, it does
lose marks somewhat. If you have a universal mount then it
really is a good GPS setup and as you can see will fit easily into
most universal mounts.
The only thing I dislike about the
antenna is the plug on the end of the antenna lead that plugs into a
socket on the side of the Pretec card, is a push in one, which is
great for quick access, but it's quite hard to pull out, and sometimes is
difficult to unplug the cable from the GPS card due to having nothing
to grip onto except for the lead. This suggests to me that wear and tear
could set in over a period of time with daily use of plugging in and
unplugging the antenna, but the antenna cost won't break the bankat
around £30.
|
Pretec Compact Flash GPS Card comes
bundled with AutoRoute 2002 (for residents in Europe) or Street
and Trips 2002 (for residents in US) and Portable Guide.
Technical Details
Features:
-
CompactFlash form factor, CFA
Compliant
-
OEM product development is fully
supported
-
Twelve parallel satellite tracking
channels for fast acquisition and reacquisition
-
Support for true NMEA-0183 v2.2 data
protocol
-
Enhanced algorithms provide superior
navigation performance in urban canyon and foliage environments.
-
Maximum navigation accuracy achievable
with the Standard Positioning Service (SPS)
-
Enhanced TIFF upon power-up when in a
keep-alive power condition before start-up
-
Meets rigid shock and vibration
requirements
-
Automatic altitude hold mode from
three-dimensional to two-dimensional navigation
-
Automatic cold start acquisition
process
-
Built-in Antenna
-
Power saving mode with trickle power
-
LED indication for navigation update
-
Data retention with Li-Ion battery
inside
-
Reversed straight MMCX subminiature,
snap-on, coaxial RF jack receptacle
Dimensions:
Reacquisition:
-
Hot Start: 8 sec,
average
-
Warm Start: 45 sec,
average
-
Cold Start: 60sec,
average
Protocols:
|
One thing I thought I'd never see
and that's an iPAQ with a Dual PC
Card Sleeve hanging from a car
Windscreen! This is a heavy setup!
|
Conclusion
|
|
Manufacturers Website
|
http://www.pretec.com
|
Pocket GPS Reviewer
|
Dave Burrows |
Pocket GPS Reviewer Website |
Dave Burrows.com |
|
|
Rating
|
|
Durability |
|
Windscreen Suction Mount Strength |
Not Supplied |
Air Vent Mount Strength |
Not Supplied |
Car Power Cable Quality |
Not Supplied |
|
|
Overall Rating 80% |
|
How did we achieve these ratings ?
|
Review Ratings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|