Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Feedback
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Feedback
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> PocketGPSWorld Speed Camera Database
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

davidsims wrote:

PS what does NASA stand for ?

Are we talking rocket science here? Very Happy Very Happy
Edit: Or Google?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15144
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

davidsims wrote:
What did those reports say ?


both the sites in question have been seen and reported by one of our moderators.

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
davidsims
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MaFt wrote:
davidsims wrote:
What did those reports say ?


both the sites in question have been seen and reported by one of our moderators.

MaFt


Thanks for the reply but that wasn't my question

Obviously data quality is paramount - maybe you could ask the person in question to contact me directly
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

davidsims wrote:
Obviously data quality is paramount - maybe you could ask the person in question to contact me directly

Why? Naturally we recognise data quality is of the utmost importance and will ask the person who reported these for the exact circumstances.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
davidsims
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darren wrote:
davidsims wrote:
Obviously data quality is paramount - maybe you could ask the person in question to contact me directly

Why? Naturally we recognise data quality is of the utmost importance and will ask the person who reported these for the exact circumstances.


"All cameras are physically VISITED AND VERIFIED"

When visited what did they see ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How about giving us the opportunity to investigate first?
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, I have seen the reports and have full confidence in the person who made it but cannot contact them directly right now to ask about this specific report.

Until I have done so nothing will be gained from further debate.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Sallyann
Lifetime Member


Joined: Jun 23, 2006
Posts: 768

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

davidsims wrote:

The first is 1/2 mile from home and I use that road a lot - never seen a camera there and it not on the list of sites from the local Scamera partnership

Capitalisation is correct English and just looks more professional



It is also customary to use a full stop at the end of each sentence.

Sal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14892
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

davidsims wrote:
NHW = Neighbourhood watch

SNT = Safer Neighbourhood teams

And WRT? Using redundant double preposition's are we, perhap's? How it's done (by aaaaaaard Northerner's)
Sallyann wrote:
It is also customary to use a full stop at the end of each sentence.
and to put an apostrophe s at the end of "it". Personally, I also capitalise the d in David. But it takes all sort's. Rolling Eyes
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15144
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DennisN wrote:
davidsims wrote:
NHW = Neighbourhood watch

SNT = Safer Neighbourhood teams

And WRT?


WRT = With Respect To
IIRC = If I Remember Correctly
AFAIK = as far as i know
OAP = old age pensioner

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14892
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, WRT to to to to to to you saying "IIRC OAP means Old Age Pensioner", AFAIK you are not a qualified pensioner judger. Stop it! Correct me if I'm wrong. Smile
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14892
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MaFt wrote:
WRT = With Respect To
D'you know, I'd have sworn it had something to do with Subaru Confused
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, Camera #57607. Our Verifier has consulted his notes and confirms a camera van was in full operation at this location. We even have the weather recorded at the time!

With respect to #21163, this was a 2006 camera and our records back then were not as comprehensive. The verification in that case was simply that it was a feasible site following three individual reports.

Regardless of the above, neither site has been the subject of a recent report and so both will be scheduled for purge very soon.

I trust this answers your initial query?
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
davidsims
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jul 01, 2008
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Darren

thanks for the feedback. I guess this just highlights the enormity of the task and does bring in to focus one issue:

The camera partnerships are allowed in law to enforce "community concern sites" i.e. pretty much wherever they like (depending on how income is going !!)

The local partnership just lists whole towns e.g. Ipswich i.e. a van could be placed absolutely anywhere in the town (much like the police). This should not IMHO qualify it as a site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

davidsims wrote:
The local partnership just lists whole towns e.g. Ipswich i.e. a van could be placed absolutely anywhere in the town (much like the police). This should not IMHO qualify it as a site

We don't take any notice of what SCP's publish or state. Both those sites were reported by members. One was actually reported by one of our team so was a valid site at that time. The other we cannot comment on in detail as it's a very old site.

As we now have a policy of purging inactive sites they will get weeded out if no longer used as is the case here but that does not change the fact that I'm satisfied they were both active at some point in the past?
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> PocketGPSWorld Speed Camera Database All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.052 (08 May 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping