View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jjmurphy Occasional Visitor
Joined: Sep 23, 2009 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:16 pm Post subject: GATSOs with no lines on the road surface |
|
|
I am seeing more and more GATSOs that have no lines on the road in front of them. Does this mean, a. they are inactive or b. the enforcement folk don't need to confirm speed by physical measurements? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sussamb Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 18, 2011 Posts: 4462 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The latter _________________ Where there's a will ... there's a way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Duddy Lifetime Member
Joined: Dec 09, 2006 Posts: 219 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:20 pm Post subject: Gatso markings |
|
|
Sorry Sussamb, where did you obtain the information that the Gatso markings aren't required.
As I understand it to prove an offence of exceeding a speed limit still requires 2 sources of information:-
Gatso, Radar + physical photo showing vehicle set time apart over road markings.
Police radar : Radar readout + opinion of authorised operator.
I am aware photogrammetery can be used but there would still need to be known reference points visible in the photo and they would also have to prove the veracity of the photogrammetery program in court on each occasion _________________ HUAWEI P30 Pro (new edition) with Speedtrap Alert & alcatel1 for SatNav
CoPilot 10 with CamerAlert
RoadHawk in-car video
Reading glasses getting thicker as is my waist
Retired but want to go back to work for a rest. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7147 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you sure they are Gatso type cameras and not Specs average speed cameras that are now appearing ?
The latest 2017 Siemens Safezone cameras for example, whilst aimed in one direction are actually trapping speeding in both directions. They don't use road marks afaik.
Similarly mobile cameras obviously can't use non existent marks. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Despite the legalities or otherwise of road markings, to miss-quote Dirty Harry "you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well do ya, punk?".
I don't when it's a yellow box.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dales Frequent Visitor
Joined: May 04, 2008 Posts: 754 Location: Knaresborough, North Yorkshire.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think these questions are prompted by the recent Forum reference to this:-
"Meanwhile, last year, David Erasmus, from Llanelli, West Wales, successfully contested a speeding ticket when he found that the white lines painted on the road as a secondary measure of speed were too close together. Mr Erasmus measured the distances between the lines and found that they were three inches short; his case was dismissed".
The two earlier posters may well be wondering why, if white lines were once considered a necessary double-check, this no longer pertains as a safeguard against incorrect readings.
Dales _________________ nuvi 2599LMT-D, oregon 700, basecamp, memory-map. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mobiles have the police officers statement that you were speeding and the confirmatory reading of his laser jobbie = two sources of information. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dales Frequent Visitor
Joined: May 04, 2008 Posts: 754 Location: Knaresborough, North Yorkshire.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the original question was about Gatsos with white lines in front of them, or not, (and not about mobiles or yellow boxes).
Dales _________________ nuvi 2599LMT-D, oregon 700, basecamp, memory-map. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7147 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used mobiles as an example that the technology is out there to measure accurate speed without road markings.
Plus, just to check whether the camera in question is a true old style Gatso.
My guess is that Gatso & Monitron probably do need reference markers. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
dales wrote: | I think these questions are prompted by the recent Forum reference to this:-"Mr Erasmus measured the distances between the lines and found that they were three inches short; his case was dismissed". | Perhaps the rule is similar to a few bits and bobs in the MOT. e.g. If they are fitted, they must be working. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sussamb Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 18, 2011 Posts: 4462 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:26 am Post subject: Re: Gatso markings |
|
|
Duddy wrote: | Sorry Sussamb, where did you obtain the information that the Gatso markings aren't required. |
From this:
5.7.1 Second method of speed measurement
A second method of speed measurement involving a different principle (such as two
photographs or video frames taken a known time apart) shall be used to verify the
primary speed measurement. The accuracy of the second method shall be within 10%
of the speed recorded by the primary measurement. The speedmeter shall be set up in
traffic and sufficient readings taken to be able to make a valid statistical comparison of
the two speed measurements.
Lines make it easier to do so which is why they were introduced but it's not the only method. _________________ Where there's a will ... there's a way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Duddy Lifetime Member
Joined: Dec 09, 2006 Posts: 219 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Sussamb for that but what publication is 5.7.1 taken from ? _________________ HUAWEI P30 Pro (new edition) with Speedtrap Alert & alcatel1 for SatNav
CoPilot 10 with CamerAlert
RoadHawk in-car video
Reading glasses getting thicker as is my waist
Retired but want to go back to work for a rest. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sussamb Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 18, 2011 Posts: 4462 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Home Office publication:
The Speedmeter Handbook (Fourth Edition) A Guide to Type Approval Procedures for Speedmeters Used for Road Traffic Law Enforcement in Great Britain _________________ Where there's a will ... there's a way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:31 pm Post subject: Re: Gatso markings |
|
|
sussamb wrote: | Lines make it easier to do so which is why they were introduced but it's not the only method. | What other methods? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sussamb Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 18, 2011 Posts: 4462 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As posted by Duddy above, one is photogrammetry. _________________ Where there's a will ... there's a way. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|