View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
porge Lifetime Member

Joined: Jan 18, 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:34 pm Post subject: Variable Cameras M1 & M25 are they actualy Live!? |
|
|
hi guys, i drive each night down M1 and western side of M25, every night from Milton Keynes to Luton J10 there are speed restrictions for road works norm 50 or 40 mph, also on M25 there are often restrictions in place for works.
are the gantry based Vari Cams Live? apart from the cams on the gantry either side just north of J10 M1, i have not seen any flashes, i stick to the shown restricted speed as i value my clean licence, but i scare the crap out of me and other drivers when Artic's etc come bounding down your offside at 56+ when you sat like a lemon at 40 or 50!
if they are all live (the cameras in place and that match the database) what are they set at? if its +10% +2mph cars still bang through at more than 57mph,
i know knowing my luck if i sped through i would get flashed, just wondered if anyone knew what the score is on these sections of road?
Cheers |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:04 pm Post subject: Re: Variable Cameras M1 & M25 are they actualy Live!? |
|
|
porge wrote: | as i value my clean licence,.......if i sped through i would get flashed, | Can't answer your question, nor I suspect can anyone else give a definitive answer but I think you have pretty much answered it yourself. It has been rumoured that the variable speed ones don't trap when NSL is in force, but I wouldn't bet 3 points and £60/£100 on it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GerryC Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Mar 01, 2005 Posts: 1513 Location: West Mids
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There has been local suggestion that people have been caught by the M42 cameras when the signs are blank.
Regardless of whether they capture or not, the speed limit is whatever the signs say it is. If you have a yellow jacket, wear it with your elbow out the window then drive at the speed limit (or a reasonable small bit over) and watch everyone remember what speed they should be going at.
Gerry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GerryC wrote: | If you have a yellow jacket, wear it with your elbow out the window then drive at the speed limit | Wot and air condition the M25? I don't think so. A blue light on the roof works for me  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7223 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the M25 western section, clockwise, there is a camera gantry just before the M4, junction 15.
This section is 6 lanes, 3 for M25 straight on and 3 for the M4 feeder.
Thu, Fri the normal situation is that the 3 outer lanes are almost stationary and the 3 inner lanes are free flowing. (Not always true as the third lane is often filled with vehicles trying to cut into the M25 inner lane having undertaken the ones queueing).
The overhead speed limit is 40 but everyone in the inside lanes is doing 50-60.
One of these days I'll get the NIP when they activate the variable camera and when that happens I'll post. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7223 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
This whole fiasco about not having the right authorisation is laughable. Providing the cameras are accurate then they should really be in use.
I remember back in 2004 when they widened the M25 and put working roadside 40mph cameras in - the traffic flowed perfectly, even with reduced lane width.
As it is no one does the variable limit and a jam appears in no time. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
From what I have read, it's because the numbers on the variable speed limit signs are the wrong shape, and as such are not approved for speed limit enforcement. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15388 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | From what I have read, it's because the numbers on the variable speed limit signs are the wrong shape, and as such are not approved for speed limit enforcement. |
Yep - different font or something wasn't it?
Sounds silly, but just as we can be prosecuted for a wrong font on our car registration plates, so the authorities also have regulations to stick to.
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Font is a much better word than shape, but I think they said they were too skinny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GerryC Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Mar 01, 2005 Posts: 1513 Location: West Mids
|
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In the original 2002 regulations, the font used for matrix signs were set out and should be matched as accurately as possible.
The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002, Schedule 11, Part 1
The latest published amendments appear to be the 2011 ones but I don't even see mandatory speed limit signs in them.
According to The Telegraph, the problem has been sorted - presumably by adding the current font as a variant.
Gerry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|