View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Darren Frequent Visitor

Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:45 pm Post subject: Galileo - Midterm Review |
|
|
More Galileo news. Following our news of the wikileaks cable leak earlier this week (see here), OHB CEO Berry Smutny was removed from his his post. And yesterday the European Commission presented their midterm review of the European satellite navigation programme Galileo.
With the in-orbit testing of the two experimental satellites underway and the building of the first four operational satellites nearing completion the EC expect initial navigational services will commence in 2014.
Despite initial objections by the US and a myriad of other obstacles, the technical achievements have been impressive and the UK has lead the way in the design and construction of the new satellites. Each one will be more technically advanced, more accurate and far cheaper to build and launch than those of its US rival, Navstar.
The BBC were leading today with a news item claiming additional costs of €1.9 billion. These are not additional, and unforeseen, as claimed but are instead part of the anticipated costs necessary to complete the satellite constellation, which will, when finished, number 30 satellites in total.
The EU estimates that €800 billion of Europe's GDP currently relies on satellite navigation and the global market for satnav applications, growing at 30% in recent years could be worth €240 billion by 2020.
Budget costs for Galileo consist of €3.4 billion financed by the EU for work until 2013 (which includes the manufacture and launch of the first 18 satellites) and the additional, forecast €1.9 billion required to complete the infrastructure and to bring all 30 satellites into service.
Galileo will bring faster, more accurate positioning, with accuracy of one metre as well as separate, encrypted services that will be made available to critical transport and emergency service users.
For more information on Galileo see here.
_________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rowan29a Regular Visitor

Joined: Aug 22, 2004 Posts: 95 Location: North Yorkshire, England
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:37 pm Post subject: Re: Galileo - Midterm Review |
|
|
You can bet your bottom Euro that charges for personal use will be in the pipeline.... _________________ Mike -
TomTom 750 Live
iPhone 5 16GB, Kavaj "Dallas" case |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darren Frequent Visitor

Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:53 pm Post subject: Re: Galileo - Midterm Review |
|
|
Rowan29a wrote: | You can bet your bottom Euro that charges for personal use will be in the pipeline.... |
They have explicitly stated that personal use and access to the public data will always be free. Only the various other services, with built-in protection and other benefits, will be charged.
At the end of the day, with Navstar available they would have great difficulty selling Galileo service to the general user anyway. They can only justify a fee where the service offers something that Navstar doesn't.
So commercial use in transport, aviation etc will have an access fee. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
legalspeed Occasional Visitor

Joined: Sep 27, 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:39 pm Post subject: galileo |
|
|
Could it be that the new income streams for the various cash strapped European governments from road pricing cannot be introduced using a gps system that is owned by someone else? (gps by the Americans, glonass by the Russians). However, once the European galileo system is up and running at whatever cost, then the route to road pricing is wide open. Call me a suspicious old cynic if you wish, but watch this space. regards, Legalspeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darren Frequent Visitor

Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing to stop them using the existing GPS network, but Galileo will be more accurate.
Even so, there are many technical hurdles before GPS could be reliably used for road pricing. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vicz Occasional Visitor
![]()
Joined: Jun 15, 2007 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is ALL abut EU wide road pricing, and has been right from its inception. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darren Frequent Visitor

Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vicz wrote: | This is ALL abut EU wide road pricing, and has been right from its inception. |
It's not. They have gone on record to deny that, and it's a bloody expensive way to introduce road pricing. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guivre46 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Apr 14, 2010 Posts: 1262 Location: West London
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is about conflict of interest. Can't expect the US to allow EU to use their satellites if EU acts in a way not inline with US interests. Suspect something like this was happening during the Falklands crisis. There is probably looming problems with global resources, border controls, and competition for trade agreements. But we'll know when it happens. _________________ Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigPerk Frequent Visitor

Joined: Sep 06, 2006 Posts: 1618 Location: East Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly - I don't expect satnavs work too well in Iraq or Iran at the moment ... _________________ David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even when the Americans had SA on, the accuracy was good enough for normal navigation, and if integrated over time, would give you an accurate fix. Albeit probably not accurate enough to drop a bomb down an airshaft. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darren Frequent Visitor

Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | Even when the Americans had SA on, the accuracy was good enough for normal navigation, |
Only because road nav apps use snap to nearest road. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CDK Regular Visitor

Joined: Apr 20, 2006 Posts: 122 Location: Ashford. Kent. UK.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the EU system out of US control and hot/cold relationship between the US and the French (who will probably be in control) what's the betting that the US have smuggled a hidden master "Off" switch into the design - also with the international supply chain of such specialised equipment limited to handful of manufacturers (mainly US, Taiwan & Japan), who can trust that the equipment is not carrying an extra hidden payload that can be enabled/disabled as and when required.
Fact is stranger than fiction.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigPerk Frequent Visitor

Joined: Sep 06, 2006 Posts: 1618 Location: East Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Fact is stranger than fiction.... | Not if you've read Isaac Asimov's trilogy from 50 years ago it isn't (my grandfather told me ...) _________________ David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Darren Frequent Visitor

Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
CDK wrote: | With the EU system out of US control and hot/cold relationship between the US and the French (who will probably be in control) what's the betting that the US have smuggled a hidden master "Off" switch into the design |
Conspiracy theorist?
Quote: | - also with the international supply chain of such specialised equipment limited to handful of manufacturers (mainly US, Taiwan & Japan), who can trust that the equipment is not carrying an extra hidden payload that can be enabled/disabled as and when required. |
Galileo has been designed and built in the EU. It's wholly new and does not rely on tech from US/Japan. The new design uses our own atomic clocks and other packages. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Guivre46 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Apr 14, 2010 Posts: 1262 Location: West London
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|