Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:40 am Post subject: Just so you know
Dear all, where as the camera databases undoubtably help prevent you being caught by slowing down in the areas the camera/vans are used, (arguably achieving the Police's objective, as we slow down) It should be pointed out that the devices used by a large precentage of the UK Police forces can not be dectected, until they find a device that recognises the movement of a hand from within a Volvo!
The system used is called Vascar and works by callibrating the revolutions of the wheels on the car across a set mile. The device then works as a stop watch and milometre. The officer simply measures your time over to marks and then uses the patrol car, (which is callorbrated to the mile) accross the same 2 points to find the distance. Distance over time = speed, so you average speed is measured. The device does not emit any signals. So the only answer is not to speed.
Thats the type, although that appears to be an all singing all dancing one. Some kit in uk patrol cars will not have intergrated video. It should also be noted that if two officers are present in a vehicle they can collaborate each others evidence to the fact the person was speeding, eg followed for certain amount of time at constant distance and where travelling in xs of the speed limit. (on motorway). No collaboration from any kit is needed.
I got my first 3 points from a Vascar equipped traffic car over 15 years ago. I got my next 3 points a year later from a bike cop - no Vascar, no second cop, all he needed was a calibrated speedo (standard for traffic cars / bikes).
Unfortunately police traffic officers are seen an ongoing cost - salary, training, equipment, etc. This means speed cameras, as well as HATOs (Highways Agency Traffic Officers) and other bright ideas are seen as ways of saving money, and are all used to cut down / limit police numbers - I do a lot of miles and it is very rare to see a traffic police car or bike these days, compared to 10 years ago.
So we have a whole publicity circus about 'Speed Kills' which justifies speed cameras, because 'inappropriate speed, tail gating, driving an unroadworthy vehicle and driving dangerously kills' not only doesn't make such a snappy tagline but also highlights what a useless one trick pony speed cameras are.
If using the speed camera database leads to less speed cameras, and to more traffic police officers on the roads then I see that as a win-win situation. Sadly all I think it will mean is more and more desperate attempts to hide cameras and con people that minor speeding offences are the root of all evil.
Durham's chief constable, Paul Garvin....believes that fining people for speeding does not reduce accidents, which, he says, are almost always caused by other factors, including drinking, drug-taking or simple carelessness.
Mr Garvin said that as well as having fewer casualties, Durham also had 34 per cent fewer road accidents than the national average. These low accident and casualty rates were, he said, because speed was rarely a factor in crashes.
Chris _________________ HP 614c
McGuider 7.54
Memory Map
PocketGPS speed camera database
I whole heartedly agree with the last posts comments about the reduction in Traffic Officers, as the camera, and indeed the HATA or PCSO Trafiic, that are on there way can in no way replace a further and normally much more experienced bobby. We pay our taxes for fully trained proffessionals to keep us safe, not Policing on the cheap! I happen to live in Hampshire and am happy to say that the cameras here are not revenue makers but purely to reduce roads deaths. Hampshire Police have a Policy of only placing cameras on roads that have the unfortunate title of being responsible for road deaths, in addition they place cameras in such locations as corners where doing over the limit has caused death. Now I have to say that if going over 40 around a corner is dangerous and putting a camera jsut before it slows people down, I cant see and agruement against them there!
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!