View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
digital Regular Visitor
Joined: Nov 29, 2004 Posts: 88 Location: Leeds, UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:51 pm Post subject: CF card or microdrive? |
|
|
I'm thinking of getting either a PNY 80x 1GB CF card or a 2.2GB Magicstor microdrive to copy my TTN5 installation to. The PDA is an hx4700. Are there any particular pros/cons to suggest which to go for? The microdrive is £41 from Ebuyer and the CF card is £49. Is it worth paying the extra for a high speed CF card? _________________ Frank |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Go with the CF card, the micro drive will consume more battery power, and the unit you are looking at has a poor quality issue - I nearly bought one four months ago until I did some internet searches - I use 80x CF Lexus cards in the 4700, and they are great - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would agree. The Microdrive is also considerably slower, especially for larger route calculations. _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
digital Regular Visitor
Joined: Nov 29, 2004 Posts: 88 Location: Leeds, UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it uses more power and it's slower then it looks like the CF card. Thanks for the help - appreciated. _________________ Frank |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|