View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JohnBoy59 Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 21, 2005 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 11:39 am Post subject: NAVIGATION CHANGED |
|
|
Since installing 5.1 two of my regular routes have changed dramatically - unfortunately the routes are neither shortest or fastest and completely ignor the obvious, straightest route.
Anyone got any theories? _________________ Life's a bitch... then I met Jane... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you can, please post the start and end points of the route. _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnBoy59 Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 21, 2005 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RH10 7NB to RH20 2TB
I used to be routed via the A264 and A29
Now I'm routed B2110, A281, A272 and A29
Longer in distance and time...
Puzzled! _________________ Life's a bitch... then I met Jane... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MrRubberGloves Regular Visitor
Joined: May 09, 2004 Posts: 163 Location: Blackpool, England.
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On quickert I got...
Matthews Drive
Pallington Drive
Lucerne Drive
M23 x 3
M23 J11
A264/M23/J11
A264
A264 Horsham Road
A264 Crawley Road
A264 x 2
A24 x 2
Unnamed Road
A264 x 2
A264 Five Oaks Road
A29 Stane Road
A29 x 2
A29 Stane Road
New Place Road
Cousins Way, Pulborough.
0.49 hours - 27.4 miles.
On shortest I get...
GC, Maidenhead
Matthews Drive
Billinton Drive
A2220 Haslett Avenue
Three Bridges Road
A2220 Haslett Avenue
A2220 Southgate
A2220 Station Way x 3
A2219 Brighton Road
Springfield Road
West Street
A2220 Horsham Road x 4
A264 Horsham Road
A264 Crawley Road
A264 x 2
A24 x 2
Unnamed Road
A264 x 2
A264 Five Oaks Road
A29 Stane Road
High Street
Stane Road
A29 Stane Road
New Place Road
Cousins Way, Pulborough.
0.57 hrs - 22.5 miles. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldbwl Occasional Visitor
Joined: Oct 24, 2003 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use the TTG300 v5.20. Routing normally is spot on , but I live in a semi rural area, here the TTG300 tries ever so hard to route me down single car width country lanes - the speed you can go is never more than 10mph down these. Running the demo of the route TTG accelerates at this point to 49mph, lethal, if you drove like thast you'd be dead in no time!
Try CF373PE to CF105ZA. It immediately goes right in to Rock Terrace, which after 200 yards is almost impassible rather than staying on the 2 lane B road. Running the demo of the route TTG accelerates at this point to 49mph, lethal, if you drove like that you'd be dead in no time! . Many of my local journies do this. It is almost as if it it is choosing the shortest route in preference to my setting of quickest.
In my local area it is not such a problem, but when I was on hols recently it did make me a bit nervous as to which route it would take. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldboy Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Dec 08, 2004 Posts: 10643 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
It sounds like it's one of those cases where the wrong speed tag has been put on the road by TeleAtlas. Because of this TT sees this as a quick road and therfore shortest in time. _________________ Richard
TT 910 V7.903: Europe Map v1045
TT Via 135 App 12.075: Europe Map v1140 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
oldbwl Occasional Visitor
Joined: Oct 24, 2003 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It occurs to me how useful it would be to be able to change that speed tag on roads. This would enable you to add local inteligence, where you know that despite it being an A road, because it is in a major shopping area it is limited to 25% of the normal limit for that designation - when you normally use it.
The route would then perhaps avoid it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You wouldn't want to put TeleAtlas and Navteq out of their job, would you? 8) _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xda Lifetime Member
Joined: Mar 11, 2004 Posts: 1199 Location: Park Gate
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Judging by the quality of their latest map updates, they don't appear to be doing their job anyway. _________________ Graham.
TT Go720, App:9.510(1234792.1) OS:842337
GPS: V1.20, Boot: 5.5279, Home: V2.9.5.3093
Map: Europe V910.4892
Map: Europe_Truck V870.3421, Kingston 8GB SD
Nokia 925 Windows 8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrummyGit Regular Visitor
Joined: May 19, 2004 Posts: 113
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't it be good if a SatNav vendor could build a way for us to map roads for them - or maybe enhance the existing data. It would give the most up-to-date information for them, could reky on multiple users mapping the same thing to ensure accuracy and the data collected would have a significant commercial value.
Imagine how much TomTom could charge teleatlas and navteq to provide mapping updates to their existing data. They could even start to collect the Southern Ireland road network |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|