View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jDude Occasional Visitor

Joined: 18/06/2003 18:13:48 Posts: 20 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 4:47 pm Post subject: iCN630 versus TT Go |
|
|
Anyone here with both iCN630 & TomTom Go?
I would like to know which is better?
lack of touch screen and no way to do re-route while in a route .. and these are avilable on the TT Go.
thanks all, hopefully I posted this in the right forum.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
anglefire Regular Visitor

Joined: 27/05/2003 22:32:53 Posts: 114 Location: Solihull, West Midlands, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I don't have a TomTom Go, but I know someone who used one.
I believe that they both use the same map provider, so there should be no difference with the detail etc.
So the only thing that is different is the touch screen and routing.
Touch screens I don't like (Personal preference!) but the cursor on the iCN630 is very good and is fast enough most of the time.
The new iCN's may be better - remote controls being available, plus the new V3 software may well mean the routing differences are small or none existant.
So, in short, I guess you buy whatever you prefer! _________________ Mark
Website
The answer is 42. Now what is the question? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MikeB Frequent Visitor

Joined: 20/08/2002 11:51:57 Posts: 3859 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2004 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand...
I found the NavMan iCN difficult to input data. I couldnt get used to the cursor, and far prefer the touch screen.
The NavMan does have a better mechanism for stitching map segments together, you just load up the sections you want and the iCN just see it all as a seamless map. With TomTom GO you have to stop and swap maps when you move from one area to another, and you cannot create a route across map boundaries. _________________ Mike Barrett |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jDude Occasional Visitor

Joined: 18/06/2003 18:13:48 Posts: 20 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 3:57 am Post subject: Cool! |
|
|
I don't know where I can go look at the TomTom Go in person (USA - Eastcoast).
I don't like the cursor simply because it takes too long to enter a address, touchscreen sure speed up the input process.
I like the user interface that I read from the review of TT Go here, however I didn't know that this seamless map stitching problem in TT.
After reading both's comment, I should wait for the newer models to come, and perhaps choose the touchscreen (this is personal preference) w/ V3 software.
thanks a lot for the recommendations.
Jeff |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MikeB Frequent Visitor

Joined: 20/08/2002 11:51:57 Posts: 3859 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff,
The way TomTom stitches the maps is not really a problem in the USA. With the American version of the maps there are a number of options from single state to large combinations of states and even a "Major Roads" map so you can always have the right maps on the evice, it is only when you move from one area to another that this becomes an issue.
And even than it is not too big a problem. Consider driving from Boston to Seattle you would only be interested in the main roads between the two cities, but street level info at departure and destination. So you would have the state maps for the departure and destination, plus the major roads. _________________ Mike Barrett |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Frequent Visitor

Joined: Sep 10, 2003 Posts: 6460 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2004 8:38 am Post subject: Re: iCN630 versus TT Go |
|
|
jDude wrote: | Anyone here with both iCN630 & TomTom Go?
I would like to know which is better?
lack of touch screen and no way to do re-route while in a route .. and these are avilable on the TT Go.
thanks all, hopefully I posted this in the right forum.. |
It all boils down to personal preference, what you like and don't like. I have both iCN630 and TomTom GO here. There are short cummings on each device. The cursor pad on the iCN630 is slow to enter addresses, and you're right it doesn't have a touch screen, but TomTom have a huge display problem with reflections on the screen on GO where as the iCN630 has a very crisp, bright non-reflective coated screen which makes it a lot easier to see the screen in daylight and bright sunlight.
Both companies are using the same geodata provider (TeleAtlas) so it really comes down to features in the software and your preference. Some people want speed camera support, TomTom GO has this but iCN630 does not (at least not until October). The new versions (and upgraded software) coming out in October will see more topographical style maps which are an enhancement over what TomTom has.
So really it's down to what you want out of the system. Where you see limitations and what you like and don't like. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Simon1 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Aug 07, 2004 Posts: 388 Location: Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi guys,
Continuing the theme of differences between TTG and Navman, I know the TTG uses Linux as its OS which is obviously more stable than Windows. Does anyone know what the OS for the Navman ICN 510 will be? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Buxton Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 14/09/2002 20:56:18 Posts: 5231 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 510 will be running WM2003, and as it appears to run in Landscape mode, I'd say WM2003 SE is a possibility. _________________ Tim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Simon1 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Aug 07, 2004 Posts: 388 Location: Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tim, thanks for the prompt reply. For the slow ones like me, is that a windows-based OS and is it perceived to be stable? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Buxton Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 14/09/2002 20:56:18 Posts: 5231 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it's Windows Mobile. As for stability, it's Windows.....Having said that, I haven't even seen SE running on anything. _________________ Tim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jDude Occasional Visitor

Joined: 18/06/2003 18:13:48 Posts: 20 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:57 pm Post subject: 510 reviewed! |
|
|
Great review!
also, a friend of mine just got the TT Go.. I can check it out .. I think I will get this iCN510 once its avilable in the USA..
thanks all.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Simon1 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Aug 07, 2004 Posts: 388 Location: Surrey, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You've done the review? Where is it posted?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
icsys Frequent Visitor

Joined: Feb 20, 2004 Posts: 1154 Location: South Lancashire, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The review is shown on the home page...
... just in case you never visit Home heres the direct link:
http://www.pocketgpsworld.com/navman-icn510.php _________________ Ian.
iPAQ 2210 | Navman 4100 BT Receiver
Navman iCN 635
TomTom GO
Anquet OS mapping
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jDude Occasional Visitor

Joined: 18/06/2003 18:13:48 Posts: 20 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2004 6:08 pm Post subject: TT Go |
|
|
Finally, got to see the TT Go in person.
I realized something, the touch screen is not all that useful. only thing I found was that I can input and nagivate around much faster than cursor pad.
However, since it mounts to windsheild... it's depends on you and your car, it's still can't be reached to do the input ..
and like everyone else here said, it's really a personal perference.
now, I think a remote might actaully be a great idea.. (except that iCN630 is not capable of this). OR maybe a custom mount that mounts devices to the center console like below or above your stereo).
thank you all for your input.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|