Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
I can tell as fact and based upon hands-on experience, the CF Haicom 302 and 303's (be it with Sirf-II or with the cheaper Evermore) both with perfectly using either Loox600 (not on compatibility list) and Acer N10 (not on compatibility list either) and TT5. This includes the older non-foldable models too.
Also, the Sirf-II's from Rikaline have no problems working on a TT5+Acer N10 combo.
Hey KW, can you tell me what SD card your using for map storage on your Acer N10? I have the same pocket PC with the sysonchip receiver but i get terrible lag. I'm wondering if it's due to slow map transfer on the SD card? The receiver seems like the mutts nutts picking up usually 7- 8 sats on average and i've even seen 10 or 11 sats on ocassions which suprises me why i'm lagging between my actual position and where Tom Tom says i'm at...usually a couple of seconds behind? I'm going to see if i can get a freebee fast SD card from one of our suppliers to see if that helps......... perks of the IT industry
I'd just be interested to hear what sort you are running (make and capacity + free capacity)?
I can tell as fact and based upon hands-on experience, the CF Haicom 302 and 303's (be it with Sirf-II or with the cheaper Evermore) both with perfectly using either Loox600 (not on compatibility list) and Acer N10 (not on compatibility list either) and TT5. This includes the older non-foldable models too.
Also, the Sirf-II's from Rikaline have no problems working on a TT5+Acer N10 combo.
Hey KW, can you tell me what SD card your using for map storage on your Acer N10? I have the same pocket PC with the sysonchip receiver but i get terrible lag. I'm wondering if it's due to slow map transfer on the SD card? The receiver seems like the mutts nutts picking up usually 7- 8 sats on average and i've even seen 10 or 11 sats on ocassions which suprises me why i'm lagging between my actual position and where Tom Tom says i'm at...usually a couple of seconds behind? I'm going to see if i can get a freebee fast SD card from one of our suppliers to see if that helps......... perks of the IT industry
I'd just be interested to hear what sort you are running (make and capacity + free capacity)?
Cheers
Darren
Hmmm... I don't think it's the SD card posing you that problem. My bro-in-law has that N10, and he's using a very cheap "ExtremeTech" SD card (512MB), but he has no lag. I've used several pretty low budget SD cards (SimpleTech, Kingston, Apacer) on various devices (Yakumo Delta 300, Acer N35, Yakumo Alpha 300) and don't have have any problems with lagging.
On the other hand, there are quite a lot of people reporting lag problems induced by the GPS receiver itself (on the German forums, it's either that, or the POI problem, or the "My Bloody Yakumo DeltaX won't fix any Sats".
In case you don't trust the speed of your N10, why don't you download "Xcpuscalar" and push your N10 up to 400Mhz, see if it makes any difference ? (my bro-in-law uses that program constantly, pushing his 300Mhz machine to 400Mhz, so it COULD be I'm comparing apples with oranges).
My friend uses an old Loox600 (400Mhz) with a Haicom 303 CF card. No substantial lag.
My bro-in-law uses his N10, most of the time OC'ed to 400Mhz, and has a Rikaline 6021 CF card, no more lag then when using TT3.
The Yakumo Delta 300 has a build-in Nema thingy, based upon a SirfII chip, and runs at 300Mhz. No lag.
The various N35's and Alpha's run Samsung 266Mhz cpus, and use a pretty cheap GPS chipset (name escapes me right now), and wouldn't you know, no lag.
Hey thanks for the info, thats brilliant. Just out of intrest & i know it's off topic slightly but how does one over clock an N10? I really know very little about pocket PCs.
I'll try the SD card first and hope but if not then i'll crank it up?
Google around for "XcpuScalar". I'm not sure there's a test version around anymore, but there used to be a free limited trial version.
It works brilliantly on an N10 : all N10's I've had in my hands so far were capable of perfect stable 400Mhz operation, and this speed increase IS noticable.
Another nifty thing with XcpuScalar is that you can use it to prolong your battery life : it lets you decide at which cpu load the PDA should switch to what speed. Hence you can do stuff like :
Cpu load < 25% --> 100 Mhz
Cpu load 25~50 --> 200 Mhz
Cpu load 50~75 --> 300 Mhz
Cpu load > 75% ---> 400 Mhz
I swear, this works, and it works bloody brilliant. Most Loox 600's will scale to 472 Mhz, some even to 500.
Also worth noting : on the German boards, a lot of people state their lag diminished significantly after updating to 5.1. There's no mentioning of this in the changelog at TT, but heck, why not try that ?
Google around for "XcpuScalar". I'm not sure there's a test version around anymore, but there used to be a free limited trial version.
It works brilliantly on an N10 : all N10's I've had in my hands so far were capable of perfect stable 400Mhz operation, and this speed increase IS noticable.
Another nifty thing with XcpuScalar is that you can use it to prolong your battery life : it lets you decide at which cpu load the PDA should switch to what speed. Hence you can do stuff like :
Cpu load < 25% --> 100 Mhz
Cpu load 25~50 --> 200 Mhz
Cpu load 50~75 --> 300 Mhz
Cpu load > 75% ---> 400 Mhz
I swear, this works, and it works bloody brilliant. Most Loox 600's will scale to 472 Mhz, some even to 500.
Hey KW,
I managed to get a trial download. Your right it works great and is well recomended. Also very simple to use. However it did not resolve my issue with lag in TomTom. The program does work though and i proved this by trying a pocket pc game that required a mimimum spec 400mhz processor. Guess what, the game ran fine so overclocking works and the pocket PC is stable?
I think next step is to try the compactflash receiver in my dads hp2200 and see if there is any lag between that pocket PC & the receiver?
Cheers for your help and sorry for so many questions.
Darren
Also worth noting : on the German boards, a lot of people state their lag diminished significantly after updating to 5.1. There's no mentioning of this in the changelog at TT, but heck, why not try that ?
Take Care,
KW
Do you mean updating to TomTom 5? Or is there a patch 5.1?
Also can you send me a link to the German boards so i can have a read through?
I can tell as fact and based upon hands-on experience, the CF Haicom 302 and 303's (be it with Sirf-II or with the cheaper Evermore) both with perfectly using either Loox600 (not on compatibility list) and Acer N10 (not on compatibility list either) and TT5. This includes the older non-foldable models too.
Also, the Sirf-II's from Rikaline have no problems working on a TT5+Acer N10 combo.
Hi, I wonder if anyone can help me figure out my current problem with TT5...
I'm using a Haicom 303E CF card (plugged into the PDA, not via the bluetooth slipper). My PDA is a Toshiba e805. TT5 can get a signal from the 303E and thus work (sometimes the signal takes about a minute, other times it can take 5-10 minutes or longer - never had that problem with TT3 but that is not my main concern here).
The problem is that the row of satellite "bars" at the bottom of the TT5 display don't work - I think they are supposed to fill up depending on how many satellites are in use, but mine all stay empty. If I click on them so that the routing page comes up with that satellite column on the right-hand side, that also says "no satellites" - yet at the same time TT5 *is* getting a good satellite feed from the 303E and is able to work fine.
This isn't a huge problem but it would be really great to have TT5 telling me how many satellites are actually in use so that I can see when I have a weaker signal or not.
I've had this problem with TT 5.0 and also with the new 5.1 patch - no difference.
I've tried reconfiguring the GPS device but that doesn't help (selecting "Other Cable NMEA" with 4800 baud, then selecting "CF Card Generic" or whatever it is called from the top of the list).
Any ideas? (Any suggestions for getting the signal to lock on faster than the 5-10 mins it sometimes takes would also be nice!)
I dunno if this is caused by TT5 not being compatible with the 303E or with the Toshiba e805. Or something else.
Hi, I wonder if anyone can help me figure out my current problem with TT5...
...I should add that I never had this problem with TT3 - that version was always able to indicate exactly how many satellites were locked on at any given time.
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:03 pm Post subject: TT5 and gps jacket
I have just installed tt5 on my ipaq3850 and am using a navman 3400 jacket, it worked fine with smart st v1.91 but when using tt5 it doesnt give me the option to assign it to com 5 only com 3, if I assign to the navman bit the yellow and black ball spins but there is no signal. i have updated with the fix and I can get signal with that but not on the main programme.
Any ideas?
Thanks
For info, my SysOnChip CF Plus II antenna with 256MB Ram works as brilliantly with TT5 as it did with TT3. Hardware is an iPAQ 2210 with UK maps on the SysOnChip CF card and continental Europe maps on a 1.0GB SD card.
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
All times are GMT + 1 Hour Goto page Previous1, 2, 3Next
Page 2 of 3
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!