View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gollom Occasional Visitor
Joined: Mar 13, 2004 Posts: 45 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:00 pm Post subject: SD or CF? |
|
|
Good evening! I am using the EMTAC sleeve with an iPAQ 3870 and need to replace my memory card. I'd prefer to use SD on the iAPQ over CF on the sleeve - is there any downside to this?
Also, could someone advise the best all-round cards as I have seen some negative response over certan types.
Thanks for your help |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MarkHewitt Frequent Visitor
Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 1077 Location: Chester-le-Street & York
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
In general CF will give you faster speed than SD. SD can also cause some problems, my ipaq would crash every 10 minutes using SD but with CF it is solid as a rock!
Check out the news feature on the front page. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Privateer Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: 30/12/2002 17:36:20 Posts: 4916 Location: Oxfordshire, England, UK
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Gollom,
There are a few SD cards that don’t perform that well with PPCs. CF cards are generally not so bad.
I use a Kingston 512MB SD card in my iPAQ 3970 and it works OK. I also use Kingston 1000MB CF cards in my iPAQ 2210. Personally, I’m happy with Kingston cards. A good place to get cards is Valueflash.
Regards, _________________ Robert.
iPhone 6s Plus, iOS 14.0.1: iOS CamerAlert v2.0.7
TomTom GO Mobile iOS 2.3.1; TomTom (UK & ROI and Europe) iOS apps v1.29
Garmin Camper 770 LMT-D |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Freddan101 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Feb 18, 2005 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is there any special brands one should stay away from?
I'm also loojing for a new storage card to store TT3 maps and other stuff on. I would prefer SD so I have the CF slot free for future expansions but if CF is faster maybe it's better to go with that. Heard that CF consumes more battery though?
/Fred |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnmar Regular Visitor
Joined: 21/02/2003 11:37:04 Posts: 164 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Gollom
I am running a very similsr setup to you. For the first year of ownership, I had a 256MB CF card for the maps in the sleeve. This was a Kingmax card, which I believe is a rebadged Sandisk? I had quite a lot of problems with crashes and freezing etc which was attributed to the low 32MB of RAM on the iPAQ. I subsequently upgraded to a 512MB Viking CF card for additional maps. As if by magic, all my operational difficulties vanished. It's therefore important to select a quality built card, even for CF as opposed to SD.
Also, I believe I am correct in saying that the iPAQ 38** series didn't implement SD opereation particulalrly well, as there is only a very narrow bandwidth for data transfer from the card. I suapect that others on the forum will be able to shed more light on this.
Hope this helps.
Regards _________________ John
iPAQ3830 (32MB) PPC2002 ROM 1.20
CF Expansion Pack
Holux GR-213 GPS Mouse (GSW3.1.1 -3.1.00.07 C23B1.00)
Kingston Elite Pro 1 GB CF Card for maps
Viking 512MB SD Card (not used for navigating)
TTNav 5.210 (5430) Maps of W Europe |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|