View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
philhoward Occasional Visitor
Joined: Sep 05, 2004 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:00 pm Post subject: Which is best??? |
|
|
Bit of a controversial one, but to save one piece of hardware, I want to get a smartphone-type.
Current thinking is for a Nokia 6600 and Route66 (for the traffic update facility). Being able to run a bluetooth headset AND GPS reciever at the same time would also be good, if its possible.
Looking throught the forums, some phones do some things better than others. Any recommendations?
I didn't do my homework too well, and bought a S-E P900, only to find I have a choice of...Wayfinder! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The best? The best is without any doubt the iPAQ 6315.
Let the flame war begin...
(Asking "What is the best" is never a good idea around here) _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philhoward Occasional Visitor
Joined: Sep 05, 2004 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hoping to get a lot of answers......
Preferably a phone-based one as wifey wants her PDA back... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 5:27 pm Post subject: Re: Which is best??? |
|
|
philhoward wrote: | Being able to run a bluetooth headset AND GPS reciever at the same time would also be good, if its possible. |
Here you go - no can do with the Nokia, no problem with the iPAQ _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|