View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DEANO3528 Lifetime Member
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:48 pm Post subject: Camera position anomaly |
|
|
Hi all,
I was out on the 14 at Newmarket and the 50mph Monitron's came up in the correct place as I submitted previously to the database, when the roadworks were moved. I think I edited them to move to the new place but not sure now. Anyway when I went under the roadbridge (the old camera positions) both the camera's came up as live there which is wrong.
I checked the submission map and sure enough the camera's are showing as live both by the bridge and also at the new locations slightly east of there. There are also two crossed boxes showing.
Any thoughts what I may have done, or has gone wrong? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7137 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Those 2 red boxes are pRemove requests for the 2 cameras submitted on the 5th November.
The current Streetview date is Sep 21 which shows both cameras in place so can't be quickly verified for November. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DEANO3528 Lifetime Member
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The relevant footage should still be on the dashcam which I would have thought would prove the point but it seems that photo evidence is not acceptable as verification despite having the option to submit it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7137 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Uploaded photos can be OK but often the uploaded images are tiny and when enlarged go blurry.
I don't get access to the photos. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DEANO3528 Lifetime Member
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2022 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah ok. Well I only ever sent one in I think and it (to me) looks like a cop hoding a speedgun with his m/c in the background (IIRC). However as you say, it can't be a suitable picture as it's still unverified, must be going on a couple of years later. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7137 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've just double checked your 5th Nov submission.
Whilst I can't see any photo's I can see whether the uploaded photo flag was set.
In this case it wasn't (@MaFt - no 'photo uploaded' text) so I don't think any photo was actually uploaded. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DEANO3528 Lifetime Member
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok Kremmen, thanks for the info.
I'll check my dashcam footage tomorrow at work and screen grab the bad locations to assist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kremmen Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 03, 2006 Posts: 7137 Location: Reading
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe post a screengrab here. _________________ DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldboy Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Dec 08, 2004 Posts: 10643 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:50 pm Post subject: Re: Camera position anomaly |
|
|
DEANO3528 wrote: | Anyway when I went under the roadbridge (the old camera positions) both the camera's came up as live there which is wrong. | Now verified. _________________ Richard
TT 910 V7.903: Europe Map v1045
TT Via 135 App 12.075: Europe Map v1140 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15297 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DEANO3528 wrote: | The relevant footage should still be on the dashcam which I would have thought would prove the point but it seems that photo evidence is not acceptable as verification despite having the option to submit it. |
I do use photo evidence but you didn't submit any photos for these removal requests. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15297 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The mobile you mention is now marked as 'Active'. Apologies for that, I had added my notes to say that the photo had verified it but I had not changed it's actual status! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DEANO3528 Lifetime Member
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 Posts: 131
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd confused the issue, my fault and apologies.
I have marked the fixed roadwork cameras for removal and added the pics from the dashcam the other day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|