View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RobBrady Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 21, 2004 Posts: 2718 Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:48 pm Post subject: New Average Cameras Switched Off |
|
|
Get Speed Camera Warnings For SatNavs
Get Speed Camera Warnings For iOS (iPhone and iPad)
Get Speed Camera Warnings For Android (phones and tablets)
The Birmingham Mail has revealed that nearly all of the city's new speed cameras are not switched on. Their Freedom of Information investigation shows that only one or two of new average sites are on at any one time.
The eight new point-to-point sites went "live" at the start of August - but just two of them caught speeders during the month. And almost every one of the 6113 drivers recorded speeding in the first month was by just the one camera.
Officials have said that it was not the intention to have them all on simultaneously claiming that the reason behind the scheme is deterrence and not to raise revenue.
A speed camera partnership spokesperson commented: "Like most other road safety schemes, the cameras are enforced on a rolling basis. It would defeat the purpose of the safety scheme to reveal which cameras are active at any one time. So far 6,000 people have been caught speeding and putting other road users, and themselves, at risk. That’s 6,000 drivers caught breaking the law before even a full rotation of the active cameras."
They added: "Once a full rotation has been completed, we'll publish all of the data, including how many drivers are caught speeding at each specific location."
A Birmingham City Council cabinet member for transport and roads said: "This isn't about making money, but about making our roads safer for all and the fact these cameras operate on a rotational basis further demonstrates this. It does not matter which cameras are operating at any one time, speed limits are there for a reason and if you exceed them then do not be surprised to be caught on camera."
Source _________________ Robert Brady |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 4:23 pm Post subject: Re: New Average Cameras Switched Off |
|
|
News Team wrote: | A Birmingham City Council cabinet member for transport and roads said: "This isn't about making money, but about making our roads safer for all | Well, they would say that wouldn't they. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14902 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 12:20 pm Post subject: Re: New Average Cameras Switched Off |
|
|
News Team wrote: | A Birmingham City Council cabinet member for transport and roads said: "This isn't about making money, but about making our roads safer for all | Well that's a new idea, isn't it? Set up a load of cameras that aren't working, so nobody gets caught. Then turn a couple on so that people get deterred. Three out of four cameras won't get you because they're not switched on, so that will deter you more than if they were swtiched on. Is that logic?
Average speed cameras are ideal for controlling speeding, but only if they are switched on - people who speed SHOULD be fined and the more publicity about it the more likely others are to be deterred. Surely, if you switch on all the cameras and publicise the fact that if they speed they WILL be caught, you stand a chance of deterring people. The people who get caught have obviously NOT been deterred and in the fullness of time might lose their licences to the points totting up system, a fact for which we should all be grateful.
I'm sorry, but this really does sound to me like making money. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
druck Regular Visitor
Joined: Dec 19, 2003 Posts: 96 Location: Surrey, England
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The news letter title for this article says Bristol rather than Birmingham!
You can of course guess which city is going to put average speed cameras along its miles and miles of wide open dual carriageways that are inflicted with ridiculous 40mph limits. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TuppyTrucker Lifetime Member
Joined: Sep 19, 2006 Posts: 44 Location: Mandeville en Bessin, 5km from OMAHA beach, Nomandie, France
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:08 am Post subject: Newsletter ribaldry |
|
|
"Mots of Bristol's new speed cameras are off
The Birmingham Mail has revealed that nearly all of the city's new speed cameras are not switched on. Their Freedom of Information investigation shows that only one or two of new average sites are on at any one time.
The eight new point-to-point sites went "live" at the start of August but just two of them caught speeders during the month. And almost every one of the 6113 drivers recorded speeding in the first month was by just the one camera.
Officials have said that it was not the intention to have them all on simultaneously claiming that the reason behind the scheme is deterrence and not to raise revenue."
Which is it? Bristol or Brum?
Any why are they being MOT tested? ;) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BritBrat Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 20, 2008 Posts: 40
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think it is Bristol, well I have heard nothing about it. The only thing in Bristol is the M32 speed reduction and alongside speed cameras. _________________ Garmin Drive 61 LMT-S |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RobBrady Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 21, 2004 Posts: 2718 Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apologies, it's Birmingham, it seems Darren sent the newsletter in its draft before the spellcheck. _________________ Robert Brady |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think a spelling checker would have helped as Bristol was spelled correctly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15317 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | I don't think a spelling checker would have helped as Bristol was spelled correctly. |
But it's not how you spell Birmingham. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14902 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MaFt wrote: | M8TJT wrote: | I don't think a spelling checker would have helped as Bristol was spelled correctly. |
But it's not how you spell Birmingham. |
Oh? So how DO YOU spell Birmingham? Here in Bristol we spell it B R I S T O L. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RobBrady Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 21, 2004 Posts: 2718 Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I obviously should have written "Apologies, it's Birmingham, it seems Darren sent the newsletter in its draft before the spellcheck and the final check. He would have most likely picked up the Mots in the spell check. _________________ Robert Brady |
|
Back to top |
|
|
geejay38 Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 17, 2016 Posts: 98 Location: Suffolk
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
It seems the final check was not automatically switched on like the cameras referred to in the article _________________ Nissan Connect System user
Garmin Dash Cam 45 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|