Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Welcome to North Wales - GoSafe say hi
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Welcome to North Wales - GoSafe say hi
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 8:10 am    Post subject: Welcome to North Wales - GoSafe say hi Reply with quote

pocketgpsworld.com
I support speed limits, they generally exist for good reasons and road safety is a big, and important issue. But when I see images such as this I can't help but feel anger.

The picture, courtesy of North Wales speed camera spotters, shows a mobile speed camera set-up over the A55 in Colwyn Bay North Wales. The dual carriageway here, on the primary expressway link between England, North Wales and the ferry port at Holyhead, is a 50mph limit, not for safety reasons but to reduce noise because the road was built through the centre of the town.

So it makes a prime revenue raising opportunity for GoSafe, the North Wales Safety Camera Partnership. Now we can argue about whether anyone who speeds deserves the fine or not, but the covert installation of the camera can only have been sited to catch drivers unaware, they won't ever see the camera van and the first they'll know of it is when the NIP hits their mat.

From the GOSafe website:

"Myth: Safety cameras are hidden to catch motorists out and are placed where they will record the most speeding offences.
Fact: Cameras are not hidden to catch drivers out or placed where they will record the most speeding offences. Cameras are there to encourage motorists to drive within the speed limit so the most successful cameras are those which record the LEAST number of offences not the most."


I think GoSafe need to look up the definition of hidden! This set-up doesn't even have the benefit of forcing drivers to slow down and think twice. It's this type of practice that increases the suspicion of drivers that speed cameras exist as a stealth tax, when the road is more than capable of accommodating a higher speed, there is no safety issue here.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
K13ehr
Lifetime Member


Joined: Jul 12, 2008
Posts: 286

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is no defence of course, and there are always speed camera warning signs, but this is going a bit too far and the operator should be reported to the larger press.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's this particular location that raises my ire, a modern dualled stretch that has no business being a 50 save for noise reduction measures. And to pop the camera there peeping at the rear of cars as they pass the slip below just smacks of sneakiness at its worst.

I'm about to submit an FoI request for the accident stats on the A55 through Colwyn Bay, I bet they will make for an interesting read Evil or Very Mad
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Cymro55
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jun 24, 2016
Posts: 4
Location: North Wales

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:04 pm    Post subject: A55 Reply with quote

Darren, I usually agree with your comments on here, but in this instance I am afraid you are wrong. The reason for the 50 mph limit on this stretch of the A55 is not entirely due to noise considerations (there has been a lot of noise reduction work done over the years) but it is due to the configuration of the road. There are three junctions within a couple of miles and so the slip roads are all shorter than normal at these junctions (20, 21 & 22). Consequently joining speed needs to be lower.
I think you may be surprised when you receive the accident statistics for this stretch of road.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, Ok I can see accept that, it's home turf for me so I'm pretty familiar with the layout but was sure the lowered speed was initially set in place due to noise abatement concerns but if I'm wrong then it's not unusual Very Happy

I'll post the results of the FoI request when they are forthcoming.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 2:04 pm    Post subject: Re: A55 Reply with quote

Cymro55 wrote:
Darren, I usually agree with your comments on here, but in this instance I am afraid you are wrong.
As I see it, the main cut and thrust of the original post was the fact that the camera appears to be pretty covert and not at all obvious, and is placed in such a manner as to just make money, rather than "Cameras are not hidden to catch drivers out or placed where they will record the most speeding offences. Cameras are there to encourage motorists to drive within the speed limit" (quoted from GOSafe's mythbuster). So this location appears to be in direct contradiction of GOSafe's propaganda (lies). The 'encouragement' will only arrive accompanied by a NIP. And that's not encouragement, it's punishment.
To clarify their position, I think that GOSafe should also look up the definition of 'encourage'.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
netman
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 03, 2005
Posts: 3
Location: Manchester

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is the North Wales approach all over. Not the first time they've been called out for covert installations.

Basically the approach is to stick rigidly to limits, for the entirety of the route. I've covered it many times.

So perhaps this approach works - either everyone moves along at, or below the limit - or there is revenue generation. It's probably win:win from their side!

Whether it's actually 'safer' overall to have drivers concentrating primarily on their speedometer, rather than overall hazard perception and management is a discussion that probably has no end!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cymro55
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jun 24, 2016
Posts: 4
Location: North Wales

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT, with reference to the line from my post that you have quoted, I was not saying that I disagree with Darren about the hiding of the camera, but about the need for the 50mph limit being due to safety reasons.
As it happens I DO agree that the cameras in this area are often hidden, in fact I posted on another forum about a camera van being hidden in the entrance to an electricity substation less than two miles from this latest example and I am sure you will remember the infamous 'speedcam in a horsebox' a few years ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2016 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In which case, my apologies for the quotation that was, it transpires, nothing to do with my main cut and thrust that GOSafe are lying when they say they don't hide cameras, as the photo clearly shows that they do. The reason for this must be for revenue gathering purposes. If it were for road safety and 'persuasion', then it would be in an open space for everyone to see. If you know that mobile cameras are operating in an area, you are more likely to be a little more careful with your speed control.
I do not subscribe to netman and other's theory "Whether it's actually 'safer' overall to have drivers concentrating primarily on their speedometer, rather than overall hazard perception". This is a complete red herring, as if you wish to maintain at or below the current speed limit, you do not have to drive constantly looking at your speedo. If you find that you have to do this, just slow down a little and give the "overall hazard perception" your full attention and make a real and positive contribution to road safety..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sionyn
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jun 03, 2012
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 3:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As for a few previous posters, Bae Colwyn is in my neck of the woods.
I've seen, in my mirrors, police cars sitting near the top of on-ramps regularly enough (no idea if they had speed cameras), but had no idea they were being this sneaky and underhand.
Not good. Not good at all. Evil or Very Mad

I've often heard that the 50 limit was for noise reduction because the road runs through a built-up and largely residential area, but had not previously heard that it might be because of shorter than usual slip roads. Thinking about it, though, I've a feeling that the slip roads might very well be shorter than usual.
Either or both explanations would make sense.

My favourite explanation for the 50 limit, however, is one that was suggested to me about 15 years ago: it's because so many of the local drivers are particularly slow and doddery pensioners who perhaps shouldn't be driving at all (I'm not too far off that age myself so I'm not being ageist here!) and don't really understand the concept of slip roads, so the limit is both for their safety and for that of everybody else passing through the town.
It might not be true, but it's always made me smile. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not the police or specifically the speed limit that are being criticised here, it's the civilian fund raising (under the pretext of road safety) setup called GOSafe, who claim not to hide their cameras to raise money but the photographic evidence says otherwise.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 7122
Location: Reading

PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we have a stretch of road with either a history or hazards then that sounds to me like a specs zone. For the whole stretch keep it at 50 and Bob's your uncle.
_________________
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Engine_Counter
Lifetime Member


Joined: Dec 20, 2005
Posts: 23
Location: Derby, UK

PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Come on guys. What's wrong with covert operations? There are signs warning that cameras MAY be in operation, if you choose to ignore them than that's your fault.

This is meant to be a site that's encouraging safe and legal driving. IMHO anyone complaining about covert operations is indirectly admitting that they speed.

If everyone drove within the limits traffic would flow more freely and there'd be fewer accidents. Better for everyone, rather than the selfish ones who don't give a damn about anyone or anything.

Personally i'm disgusted that speed cameras are used as a means of generating funds. IMHO

    2 strikes on a single stretch of road
    4 strikes anywhere

should lead to loss of license for 12 months.
After loss of license any additional strike should lead to a minimum of 3 months prison, preferably with hard labour Very Happy
_________________
Al

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Android 11.0
CamerAlert V 1.4.0.876 Doesn't Work
TomTom Go Mobile V3.1.0 (4036), Map - UK & ROI - V15464/2.4.3.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Engine_Counter wrote:
Come on guys. What's wrong with covert operations? {snip}
Personally i'm disgusted that speed cameras are used as a means of generating funds.
How well do those apparently contradictory statements fit together. And just what the heck do you think the theme of this thread is? Just for clarification, it's about general dislike of covert, cash cow, cameras set up by GoSafe in North Wales.
According to the ACPO guidelines, cameras are supposed to be visible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Engine_Counter
Lifetime Member


Joined: Dec 20, 2005
Posts: 23
Location: Derby, UK

PostPosted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT wrote:
How well do those apparently contradictory statements fit together. And just what the heck do you think the theme of this thread is? Just for clarification, it's about general dislike of covert, cash cow, cameras set up by GoSafe in North Wales.
According to the ACPO guidelines, cameras are supposed to be visible.

They go together very well. I'm saying I don't think there's anything wrong with covert cameras, but they should be used to deter speeders not to generate funds.
I don't care what the ACPO guidelines say, any law abiding motorist should have no problem if they aren't visible.
_________________
Al

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra - Android 11.0
CamerAlert V 1.4.0.876 Doesn't Work
TomTom Go Mobile V3.1.0 (4036), Map - UK & ROI - V15464/2.4.3.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.104 (23 Oct 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping