| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RobBrady
Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Posts: 2718
Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
 Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 12:50 pm Post subject: Judge Believed Motorist Over Speed Camera |
 |
|
Get Speed Camera Warnings For SatNavs
Get Speed Camera Warnings For iOS (iPhone and iPad)
Get Speed Camera Warnings For Android (phones and tablets)
An Australian driver has won his case over a speeding ticket after a battle that took 15 months.
Paul Daniel and his father-in-law was were approaching Melbourne's Wellington Road bridge on their way to an annual fishing trip.
The two were discussing and laughing about reports in the media claiming drivers had been wrongly fined at the bridge.
Mr. Daniel said: "Here comes the Wellington Road bridge, have a look at my speed" His father in law looked at the speedometer and said, "Yep no worries" at which point they both laughed.
Mr. Daniel added: "I was going between 95kmh and 97kmh. Two weeks later I get the fine in the mail." The notice alleged he was travelling at 110kmh on a 100kmh stretch.
He received advice from a barrister friend, as he could not pay a solicitor, and fought the charges himself. He even took it to appeal.
A Judge has now dismissed the charges in the County Court. Mr Daniel said that he believed the judge preferred their evidence over that of a machine.
It will be interesting to see if others who were prosecuted come forward claiming the speed camera was incorrect.
Source
_________________
Robert Brady |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pdfbt40
Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jan 23, 2008
Posts: 56
|
| Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be good to know what evidence was presented in support of the camera.
Presuming its an older Gatsco type, were 2 photos presented or just a radar measurement I wonder? Also was any registered calibration claim made? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14902
Location: Keynsham
|
| Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| pdfbt40 wrote: | It would be good to know what evidence was presented in support of the camera.
Presuming its an older Gatsco type, were 2 photos presented or just a radar measurement I wonder? Also was any registered calibration claim made? |
Well, they're upside down aren't they?
_________________
Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 7149
Location: Reading
|
| Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't be difficult to send a plod car through the camera zone a few times to see what speed it reckons
_________________
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15322
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
| Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"You're on trial today for murdering Mrs Smith - what's your defence?"
"Well, your honour, my Dad says I didn't do it..."
"OK then, you're free to go!"
Either the Australian legal system is a joke or there's WAY more to this!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![]() Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in for private messages
Log in
