Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Ford's Intelligent Speed Limiter - bye bye speeding tickets?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Ford's Intelligent Speed Limiter - bye bye speeding tickets?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:43 am    Post subject: Ford's Intelligent Speed Limiter - bye bye speeding tickets? Reply with quote

pocketgpsworld.com
Ford is the first vehicle manufacturer to offer an system that can help a driver to avoid exceeding the speed limit.

Their 'Intelligent Speed Limiter' has a windscreen mounted camera that is able to recognise road signs and adjust the maximum vehicle speed accordingly. The data is also presented in the instrument cluster and includes the speed limit and other data such as overtaking restrictions.

Vehicles equipped with on-board navigation can also use the map data to supplement the sign recognition. The driver maintains full control, the limit can be adjusted manually and overridden by firm pressure on the accelerator if required.

Rather than use engine braking to retard speed, Ford controls the amount of fuel entering the engine and thus restricts engine torque.

Source: https://media.ford.com

email icon

_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Ford's Intelligent Speed Limiter - bye bye speeding tick Reply with quote

News Team wrote:
Rather than use engine braking to retard speed, Ford controls the amount of fuel entering the engine and thus restricts engine torque.
But surely by reducing the fuel will implicitly cause engine breaking the same as lifting your foot of the loud pedal does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 7141
Location: Reading

PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2015 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also wonder if the car suddenly slows down will someone behind think you are being funny and start a roadrage incident?

Could also put you in danger during an overtake manoeuvre, even though you can override it those valuable seconds...
_________________
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14902
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sounds like it will require a re-think of driving behaviour - no longer should you have "those valuable seconds" ...... "during an overtake (exceeding the limit) manoeuvre".

In other words, if you can't exceed 60, you don't try to overtake somebody who is doing 58 on a single carriageway, if you can't exceed 30, you don't try to overtake somebody doing 27 in town. That is frequently happening nowadays.
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's poppycock Dennis
Quote:
The driver maintains full control, the limit can be adjusted manually and overridden by firm pressure on the accelerator if required.
Just like what you do when you overtake a slow moving vehicle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bunty1948
Regular Visitor


Joined: Apr 27, 2011
Posts: 121
Location: Northallerton North Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT wrote:
That's poppycock Dennis
Quote:
The driver maintains full control, the limit can be adjusted manually and overridden by firm pressure on the accelerator if required.
Just like what you do when you overtake a slow moving vehicle.


That's correct, but if the override function is like the one on my vehicle, you have to floor the throttle and then the thing takes off like a scalded cat. It's also automatic and like most vehicles these days turbocharged. The thought of suddenly unleashing all that torque in an instant would unsettle many drivers especially if the surface is anything but bone dry. I'm not anti new technology, but unless the driver instruction that we undertake takes on board such as this in much more detail than the current driving test does, there might just be some issues. I remember a lad in my part of the world being killed because he didn't realise just how much torque would be released from his newly acquired Sierra Turbo back when, and believe me many new cars match and exceed those figures today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jeff-d
Lifetime Member


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 42
Location: Thurnby, Leicestershire

PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My 2012 Focus already has an optional speed limiter and also has the camera to read the signs. All Ford has done is connect the two.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
exportman
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Mar 26, 2006
Posts: 261
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just because your are driving at the speed limit does not make it safe.

Unfortunately many think so and will willingly abdicate responsibility to the machine.

It will end in trear
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimmyTheHand
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Apr 16, 2005
Posts: 386

PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2015 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DennisN wrote:
Sounds like it will require a re-think of driving behaviour - no longer should you have "those valuable seconds" ...... "during an overtake (exceeding the limit) manoeuvre".

In other words, if you can't exceed 60, you don't try to overtake somebody who is doing 58 on a single carriageway, if you can't exceed 30, you don't try to overtake somebody doing 27 in town. That is frequently happening nowadays.


I wonder how much research they have done on driver behaviour with this sort of aid, I can see people just holding max accelerator (or more than necessary) and getting a sudden unexpected surge of acceleration at change of limit (right into rear of car turning)
_________________
J.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15311
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

exportman wrote:
Just because your are driving at the speed limit does not make it safe.


No, but if that's the case then it's still safer than driving over the limit. In which case this is a positive invention.

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cornz
Lifetime Member


Joined: 05/01/2003 10:51:57
Posts: 118
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:15 am    Post subject: This is a bad idea Reply with quote

Yet another piece of tech that takes decisions away from the driver.
Most cars have this system already, its called cruise control.
This is a solution looking for a problem. More to go wrong in my opinion. Just like these start-stop cars, the extra wear on the engine / starter motor and given that ALL cars use more fuel and oil as well as emit the most pollution when starting, I still fail to see how that is a useful feature.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
exportman
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Mar 26, 2006
Posts: 261
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MaFt wrote:
exportman wrote:
Just because your are driving at the speed limit does not make it safe.


No, but if that's the case then it's still safer than driving over the limit. In which case this is a positive invention.

MaFt


A number on a stick does not indicate a safe speed only the legal maximum
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15311
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Apr 14, 2015 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

exportman wrote:
MaFt wrote:
exportman wrote:
Just because your are driving at the speed limit does not make it safe.


No, but if that's the case then it's still safer than driving over the limit. In which case this is a positive invention.

MaFt


A number on a stick does not indicate a safe speed only the legal maximum


Sorry, I'm not quite sure what your issue is then?

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.123 (18 Dec 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping