SPECS3 Camera

[chas921]

M8TJT.......Thats my opinion, ridiculous or not?

But you said .........The computer can do the 'pairing' between any two cameras it is programmed to.....


I knew I`d get a response and a possible result/outcome, one which I could not find on the net?

SPECS3 uses ANPR. Every camera will carry out these checks, as long as the camera is on. In order to speed check you over a baseline, only two cameras are EVER required. If you arrive ahead of the threshold set, a crime is recorded!. This is examined?, and if at fault, you receive a NIP in the post.

So-far so-good!

However, from what you said, I will now assume the following....

It would appear to me now, from what you described above, that the SPECS3 cameras are not, and do not need to be paired at all, in the literal sense, ie one after the other, as (I'm) were so used too! Its making a little more sense now. Your right. Any camera will detect me, as their just going about their ANPR task. The next camera (no matter where, even if I turn down another road?) records ANPR and compares me on the database to the last recorded ANPR check, checks the time & distance, and hey presto a match, and oops!, an over speed, so here comes my NIP?

Its the system that makes the paired zone between those two cameras, no matter how distant they are from each other! Its not pre-set. Cunning? lane changes cannot hide you on a motorway ( I see the logic now)

Only joking about the NIP, nothing coming my way.
ps. You still, therefore, cannot link an Entry camera to more than one Exit camera at the same time, no need? Lol.

Cheers for your reply, its helped to make sense of the logic.
[/u][/i]
_________________
Device:TOMTOM START 52 & SNOOPER 3ZERO

Take care, keep your eyes on the road, not the navigator?

chas

[DennisN]

Hmm. How about places like Nottingham which has Specs cameras blossoming on every street corner?

Go from A to C via B, no speeding. But go via D and you've burned a lotta rubber. I wonder how the cameras know which route you've used?
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

[MaFt]

[M8TJT]

Presumably if there's a situation that you describe there will be no NIP as the measurement would be ambiguous.

[DennisN]

[MaFt]

Sorry, I got it the wrong way round, they'd have to assume you took the SHORTEST direct route, which would result in the slower average speed.

MaFt

[DennisN]

So you can burn mucho rubber going via the scenic long way round.
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

[MaFt]

[DennisN]

Oh yes they ARE going quicker. I see it every day. Those people in back to front baseball caps with fast cars with big exhaust pipes that make a lotta BRRRM, BRRRRM noise, they're going helluva quick when they pass me to get up to the traffic lights before I do. It gives them an extra 17 seconds to listen to bangy bangy music whilst they wait for me to catch up.
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?.
Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!