View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Major_Route Occasional Visitor

Joined: Oct 25, 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:34 am Post subject: Useless course |
|
|
Clearly the insurance companies think the course is worthless. It does nothing to educate those on it to help speed awareness. Drivers who take it are worse than those who don't. I think the police should answer that with facts and statistics to stick it to the insurance companies and stop the nonsense. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lacy Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jul 26, 2006 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
The article strikes me as being somewhat light on facts and may well just be scaremongering. 'It has been discovered that some insurance companies.......'
Discovered by who? How was it discovered? Which insurance companies? There is not one cited example of this being the case.
However, IF certain companies are loading policies having asked the question well, they are free to ask whatever questions they wish in assessing the risk they are being expected to cover and those questions must be answered honestly and completely. You are free, however, to take your business elsewhere should you not like the questions........ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AliOnHols Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Oct 15, 2008 Posts: 1942
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm getting fed up with being a wallet on wheels. Too scared even to scratch my nose at the wheel unless some over-zelous do-gooders decree that my car was out of control for a second and they have the evidence of 20 zillion cameras to prove it!
Come the revolution when we stand united, refuse to tax and insure our vehicles and go everywhere at the speed we feel is correct for the road and the conditions. Just like we used to! Demand that we, and our money, are not taken for granted.
There would be too many people for the Authorities and Rip-off companies to deal with, the system would go into melt down.
Flame Away!
EDIT - Naivety is bliss! _________________ Garmin Nuvi 2599
Android with CamerAlert, OsmAnd+, Waze & TT Europe.
TomTom GO 730, GO 930, GO 940 & Rider2.
SatMap Active 10 & 20. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Daggers Lifetime Member

Joined: Jun 20, 2005 Posts: 1096 Location: Solihull, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lacy wrote: | Discovered by who? How was it discovered? Which insurance companies? There is not one cited example of this being the case. | The BBC article does actually state that it is Admiral. I understand it may also be subsidiaries of Admiral. _________________ Garmin DriveSmart 50 LMT-D |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lacy Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jul 26, 2006 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ahh! That'll teach me to check out the link!
In which case, Admiral, and any company that asks the question, should be avoided. Thee are plenty of other companies out there; I just hope they don't all take their lead from Admiral.
The irony is that, as mentioned previously, the courses are only offered to minor transgressors so one could argue that, having had a dose of 're-education' they should pose a LOWER risk than someone who has never been caught speeding..... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lacy wrote: |
In which case, Admiral, and any company that asks the question, should be avoided. Thee are plenty of other companies out there; |
You'd be surprised how many others actually ARE still Admiral...
Diamond,
Bell,
Elephant.co.uk,
Gladiator...
If it all gets too confusing, you could go to one of the independent comparison sites like Confused.com....
Ah, no, hang on. They are owned by Admiral too.  _________________ "Settling in nicely" ;-) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lacy wrote: | they are free to ask whatever questions they wish in assessing the risk they are being expected to cover | Except 'Are you male or female?' Companies should be able to assess risk on any topic they want to to set premiums. Gender discrimination is a load of baloney as female drivers are known to statistically lower risk than male, so their premiums should be lower and shove the politically correct tossers in the EU up their own a****s |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|