Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:59 pm Post subject:
Theres loads of them around, but why should one of them lock the thread on the whims of one or two posters? As has been said, most of the obvious options have been played out so what on earth would be achieved by locking the thread? If you don't want to read any more, then don't read it, it is optional you know.
Joined: Sep 06, 2006 Posts: 1618 Location: East Hertfordshire
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:03 pm Post subject:
No point in locking the thread and just opening another one - let the bleaters bleat, if that keeps them happy. They'll do it here, and if they can't, they'll do it there (they'll do it anywhere).
I agree though, a comment from the 'staff' would be a help! (Maybe Friday's newsletter will be revealing!) _________________ David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)
Last edited by BigPerk on Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:25 pm; edited 1 time in total
Theres loads of them around, but why should one of them lock the thread on the whims of one or two posters? As has been said, most of the obvious options have been played out so what on earth would be achieved by locking the thread? If you don't want to read any more, then don't read it, it is optional you know.
Hardly a whim, more a suggestion, given 'obvious options played out' and based on the recent 'off topic' and 'repetitive' bits (I quote from others, rather than say it myself). I know I don't have to read any more, and you can rest assured this will be my last post on this thread, before I get tarred with one brush or another. Over and out.
Joined: Aug 21, 2005 Posts: 1761 Location: Kent, England
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:26 pm Post subject:
Another 4 posts in 20 minutes that add absolutely nothing whatsoever to the debate sort of proves my point methinks.
And always remember one man's "whim" is another's "sensible suggestion". As for reading it still, we are all as bad as one and other. _________________ Peter
HTC Sensation
Sygic GPS for Europe (No more TT "support"!)
Copilot for USA
Bury CC9060 bluetooth car kit & Brodit mount
Joined: Dec 27, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: South Lincs, UK.
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:31 pm Post subject:
I'm a bit late to this particular party but most of the debate seems to revolve around existing lifetime members and the future viability of the business.
As Daren is one of the few people to actually have financial details available to him and he has stated there is no intention to revoke existing lifetime memberships I think we can assume that he believes that the business will remain viable without revoking them.
For the future have the team considered withdrawing the lifetime offer for mobile camera submissions or offering a reduced reward for mobiles? It seems to me that it is much easier to be first to spot a mobile camera as they are used in many more locations than fixed cameras. Removing or restricting the reward for mobiles might reduce the number of new lifers to sustainable levels. The lifetime reward for mobiles is a relatively new offer. _________________ Paul
Joined: Sep 06, 2006 Posts: 1618 Location: East Hertfordshire
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:31 pm Post subject:
Quote:
If you don't want to read any more, then don't read it, it is optional you know. Gun Shoot Out
The only 'slight' flaw in this oft-quoted argument is that, if you just stop reading posts, you don't know whether there are more useful ones for the discussion that you can usefully contribute to, or just more noise !
Re
Quote:
it is much easier to be first to spot a mobile camera
I stand to be corrected by verifiers, but I think mobiles need to be verified as well - so rather MORE difficult in fact to get a lifer on these then (unless I'm wrong of course). _________________ David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)
Joined: Dec 27, 2006 Posts: 998 Location: South Lincs, UK.
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject:
I believe that mobiles rely on more than one sighting plus a verifier confirming that the location is plausible. The process is therefore likely to be slower than for fixed cameras but the high number of locations used may mean a high number of life memberships being awarded. _________________ Paul
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:48 pm Post subject:
I think this thread has gone on long enough now so I'm going to lock it.
As I have said already, we have no intention of revoking Lifetime memberships for those who have already secured them. I don't believe that would be right or fair.
The team will now decide how we plan to modify the offer moving forwards. We stand by the model that rewards those who report but it will have to be a fairer reward.
Thank you to all of you who took the time to post and for the constructive comments, support and suggestions. I'd be grateful if you would now allow us some time to digest the contents of this thread and decide on how we will be proceeding.
We will make a formal announcement once that is done. _________________ Darren Griffin
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
All times are GMT + 1 Hour Goto page Previous1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15
Page 15 of 15
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!