View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bmuskett Lifetime Member
Joined: May 12, 2006 Posts: 710 Location: Stockport, Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sausages wrote: | DennisN wrote: | A simple withdrawal of Lifership puts an end to it |
"To prevent this thread going downhill any further, we've had a discussion and whatever happens with the lifer award for future subscribers, those who have been awarded to date will not lose their life member award. That is agreed and will not change"
The only realistic options are the traditional ones which face all businesses:
1/ Increase the fee to use the database.
2/ Increase the user base and keep the cost to use the database the same.
3/ Reduce the cost of maintaining the database.
Combination of all three with additional revenue streams.
Traditionally, option 3 is first - redundancies and reductions in overheads and expenditure.
Reduced costs may leave additional revenue which can be spent on option 2: increasing the user base.
Option 1 is an option of last resort as it could diminish the customer base. |
I'm sure number 3 has already happened, and 2 has with the development of CamerAlert for iPhone and Android.
If you consider rescinding the life membership and charging everyone to fall under Option 1, then it may diminish the overall customer base if some lifers choose not to pay, but it will increase the paying customer base, if the posts in this thread are anything to go by.
I've been back through the whole of this thread and noticed that the majority of lifers expressing a preference would be willing to pay in future to keep the site going. Just a couple are repeating Darren's promise not to take away the FLM, and trying to stop debate on that option.
Only the PGPSW team know the numbers and no doubt they're poring over the spreadsheets as we type. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sausages Lifetime Member
Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bmuskett wrote: | Just a couple are repeating Darren's promise not to take away the FLM |
Then there's no need for anyone to try to force Darren's hand, is there ?
He's said he won't. People are therefore wasting time quacking on about it.
Time which could be better spent coming up with ideas for alternative revenue streams.
A voluntary donation option is obvious, ideally with an "I Support PGPSW" icon
Bronze, Silver and Gold & Platinum levels of support ?
£5/year £10/ year £15/ year & £20/year
There's an actual workable idea.
Probably the first in amongst 12 pages of quackery about sacrifice and martyrdom. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bmuskett Lifetime Member
Joined: May 12, 2006 Posts: 710 Location: Stockport, Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sausages wrote: | bmuskett wrote: | Just a couple are repeating Darren's promise not to take away the FLM |
Then there's no need for anyone to try to force Darren's hand, is there ?
He's said he won't. People are therefore wasting time quacking on about it. |
I don't think so. I think it's a mistake for them to limit themselves in that way.
sausages wrote: | Time which could be better spent coming up with ideas for alternative revenue streams.
A voluntary donation option is obvious, ideally with an "I Support PGPSW" icon
Bronze, Silver and Gold & Platinum levels of support ?
£5/year £10/ year £15/ year & £20/year
There's an actual workable idea.
Probably the first in amongst 12 pages of quackery about sacrifice and martyrdom. |
Something similar has already been suggested, and Darren has said they are considering it. Will you be contributing?
And there are other suggestions amongst those 12 pages. Try reading them again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sausages Lifetime Member
Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bmuskett wrote: | I think it's a mistake for them to limit themselves in that way |
I think it's commendable that the team to have promised to maintain PGPSW lifers in the position they are in.
That generates a lot of goodwill and as anyone actually who runs a business will confirm, you can't buy goodwill at any price, you must earn it. Having earned goodwill it's all too easy to lose it. Trust me, I've been there and made that mistake with my clients and I've had it done to me enough times by shoddy businesses to recognise and appreciate the value of goodwill.
As to the question will I contribute ? Of course I will. I already have contributed in reporting cameras which adds value to the database/subscription model. I've got two cameras under my belt. I've tried to report more and will continue to do so but I usually find that other members have got there first.
I also offered to volunteer as a verifier some time ago when I was racking up 30k+ miles a year.
I do substantially fewer miles these days but would still offer to verify cameras within 50 miles of my location, at my own expense. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bmuskett Lifetime Member
Joined: May 12, 2006 Posts: 710 Location: Stockport, Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Commendable, but possibly misguided. I get your point about the goodwill though. We'll just have to wait and see what they decide. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sausages Lifetime Member
Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bmuskett wrote: | Commendable, but possibly misguided. I get your point about the goodwill though. We'll just have to wait and see what they decide. |
Interim ? I think the voluntary donations will go some way to clearing a path over the coming months.
I'd like to know where the money is going though. How much of a contribution the site actually needs to stay afloat and why.
No point peeing in the wind. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
actd Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 26, 2008 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just my thoughts - the free or discounted membership should be to encourage actively keeping the database up to date, so how about a 50% discount for the first (new) camera reported, then an additional 10% for each new camera, with the discount falling by 10% on each renewal. That way there's an incentive to keep reporting, and the discount has a maximum life. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
actd Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 26, 2008 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One more thought - any chance of selling the updates to companies (such as Navteq for my Nissan Connect) and coming to an arrangement with them to update the databases - I won't buy Navteq's updates as they aren't as up to date, but would love the PGPSW to be available in the official .ntq file format. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14902 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sausages wrote: | bmuskett wrote: | Commendable, but possibly misguided. I get your point about the goodwill though. We'll just have to wait and see what they decide. |
Interim ? I think the voluntary donations will go some way to clearing a path over the coming months.
I'd like to know where the money is going though. How much of a contribution the site actually needs to stay afloat and why.
No point peeing in the wind. |
I'm afraid I find your attitude difficult to understand. Before subscriptions were introduced, this site existed solely on donations and advertising. I cannot for one minute think they have not been doing their best to get more advertising revenue. I have no idea what the donations brought in for the year 2005, before subscriptions came in. But I'd bet my mortgage that THAT revenue source was as you put it, peeing in the wind and relying on donations to clear a path to the future smacks of snowballs and hell!
And what gives you the nerve to demand to know where the money is going and how much they need and why?
Perhaps we should remember that this thread was started by a member suggesting that appealing for subscriptions seemed odd in view of the Lifer award policy. It was NOT started by "Team", they did not start a move on the matter. But obviously, it was overdue. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14902 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Oldboy"] Oldboy wrote: | DennisN wrote: | Yes, I've been there, but I couldn't see anywhere for my membership ID? Does it by any chance know who I am? |
Quote: | To 'extend your subscription' implies that the system knows who you are. | If already a Subscriber, it remembers who you are, and when your subscription 'expires'.
I've just been there, done that, and it works.
And whatever is decided, I will do it again if that is what it takes to keep this ship afloat. |
Yes, I found out it worked when I did it at 9:30am before I got called for work. It has given me a problem still - it didn't renew as I expected, it extended my existing Lifership by a year. So the problem now is how to remember to do it again next October. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sausages Lifetime Member
Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
DennisN wrote: | And what gives you the nerve to demand to know where the money is going and how much they need and why? |
That's such a stupid comment it doesn't warrant an explanation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
sausages wrote: | I'd like to know where the money is going though. How much of a contribution the site actually needs to stay afloat and why. |
DennisN wrote: | And what gives you the nerve to demand to know where the money is going and how much they need and why? |
sausages wrote: | That's such a stupid comment it doesn't warrant an explanation. | And that's a rude and stupid answer to a reasonable question. Why do you think you aught to know the company finances? Has it actually got anything to do with you? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterc10 Frequent Visitor
Joined: Aug 21, 2005 Posts: 1761 Location: Kent, England
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think this is all getting a bit out of hand. Let's all calm down and debate this without swapping insults.
I suspect the powers that be have got a good idea of the thoughts of the members and can bear them in mind when deciding what to do next. We need to be aware that it is their business, not ours, but equally I am sure that they are aware that they have no business without us. They are never going to be able to please all of the people all of the time.
May be time to lock the thread and move on?? _________________ Peter
HTC Sensation
Sygic GPS for Europe (No more TT "support"!)
Copilot for USA
Bury CC9060 bluetooth car kit & Brodit mount |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sausages Lifetime Member
Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Posts: 62
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | Why do you think you aught to know the company finances? Has it actually got anything to do with you? |
If I am to be asked to donate then I would like some assurances that the reason the donations are required are not due to people drawing huge salaries or taking large dividends.
If people are going to be asked to donate then effectively they become share/stake holders.
Quite a lot of information is available via companies house. You do realise that, don't you ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aj2052 Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 03, 2005 Posts: 1431 Location: Leics,UK
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lets be Fair and Reasonable, I did not see any Demand _________________ Moto G5s Plus, Sygic 17.4.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|