View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shaunppl Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jun 02, 2006 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:52 pm Post subject: Update |
|
|
Well after weeks and weeks of waranglings, i have been given Legal Aid and a local solicitor to me has taken on the case, (even though it was refused 2 times in the past)
The prosecution still havent released any more documents as of the pre-tril hearing on the 20th this month, we have now submitted the printout logs from the GPS unit to the prosecution, and a first draft of the technical experts section 9 regarding the video evidence.
I was informed that the prosecutions legal expert has now produced his 50+ page report and i will get a copy tomorrow.
will not be able to let any details out of either reports or printouts until the conclusion of the case, but thought i would let you all know that its still going on.
thanks for all you support in the ast.
shaunppl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spook51 Lifetime Member
Joined: Mar 26, 2004 Posts: 548 Location: East Midlands
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
_________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blimey! Good detective work Spook! (or a strange "coincidence")
shaunppl wrote: | . . . unless i am a computer wizard that knows how to alter a GPX record whatever that is and what can do it . . . | |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NickG Frequent Visitor
Joined: Nov 09, 2003 Posts: 357 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hehe! Looks like shaunppl is *busted*. Hope he enjoys his jail time.
Surprised they even considered it as evidence anyway as it's just an editable text file. It shouldn't have even been admissible.
If you actually want to use a GPS to prove your innocence in such cases (assuming you actually are - unlike Shaun), then you need to get a device which digitally signs the recording so that it cannot be altered afterwards. For example the Roadhawk does this (and also records forward-facing video and sound at the same time - digitally signed so it cannot be tampered with). Footage from a Roadhawk has already been used in court, with Roadhawk turning up as the expert witnesses to verify the data. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skippy Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12 Posts: 2946 Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NickG wrote: | Surprised they even considered it as evidence anyway as it's just an editable text file. It shouldn't have even been admissible. |
Me too, but I guess if it was presented as evidence then they have to consider it even if it is weak and it's probably going to be rejected.
Falsifying evidence is a pretty serious thing to do and he's in deep trouble now. Should have just paid the 60 quid. _________________ Gone fishing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guivre46 Frequent Visitor
Joined: Apr 14, 2010 Posts: 1262 Location: West London
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unbelievable loss of perspective. A speeding conviction for a driving instructor has some consequences, but a prison sentence is career ending....... _________________ Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NickG wrote: | Hehe! Looks like shaunppl is *busted*. Hope he enjoys his jail time. | But he first asked in Feb 09 and this offence was in June 09
EDIT: Ah, I see, on page 2 he was referring to 1 June 09 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | But he first asked in Feb 09 |
No... Feb 9th 2010 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A GPS log will only contain UTC time and that doesn't alter for the stupid daylight saving system we employ in this country, unless the GPS log contained a checksum against each line (as you get with NMEA data) then I don't see this as someone meddling with data unless they actually admitted it.
The two time zones employed in the UK at different times of the year have nothing to do with the UTC time code the GPS clock runs on, why do you have to put an offset in to the clock on a GPS when you get off the plane in the USA - Simples, the UTC time is the same world wide - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15271 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shame he seemed to prefer listening to the advice about things being too easy to fake than the advice about WHY you can't use these things in court!!
in theory he didn't lie, in february 2010 he told us he had GPX logs showing he wasn't speeding at that point. that was true. however, he failed to tell us he had driven the route again the previous month in order to make sure he had the correct speed and that he wasn't referring to the actual date/time that he had been caught speeding at!
mike, my take on the UTC/GMT/BST thingy: the logs will have shown UTC time. when he was first caught it will have said, eg, 15:03 so the actual time for him would have been 16:03 (BST = UTC + 1) and that time will have been on the laser reading and the fine etc.
when he ran the route again he maybe made sure that he marked that location as 16:03 so it tied in with his fine. however, when the courts looked at the data they will have looked at the times and added an hour to the UTC log to get 17:03 as the BST equivalent - i.e. he was there an hour later than he said he was.
perhaps it was something like this that tripped him up and he then realised he'd been caught out?
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do you honestly believe a court or the CPS would know the difference between UTC and GMT at any time of the year, ask most lawyers what UTC is and they will reply a "Pop Group" - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guivre46 Frequent Visitor
Joined: Apr 14, 2010 Posts: 1262 Location: West London
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah ha, reference to UB40? He'll probably be getting one. _________________ Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15271 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
mikealder wrote: | Do you honestly believe a court or the CPS would know the difference between UTC and GMT at any time of the year, ask most lawyers what UTC is and they will reply a "Pop Group" - Mike |
No, I honestly don't.
"Do you honestly believe a court or the CPS would know..." the processes involved in a Southern Blot or a Northern Blot and the differnt types of restriction eznzymes required for such processes? No, I very much doubt they would. However, that doesn't mean you cannot use such evidence in court to identify a source of DNA.
Likewise, I would hope that, when faced with this 'amazing, new, unknown UTC' that you speak of that they would find an expert in the field!!
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spook51 Lifetime Member
Joined: Mar 26, 2004 Posts: 548 Location: East Midlands
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Follow the link to The Telegraph under 'From other news sites' towards the bottom of the BBC News page for more information. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|