View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nonno Occasional Visitor

Joined: Feb 01, 2008 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:38 am Post subject: CPL8 - Directional Safety Camera Warnings |
|
|
Hi, can someone confirm or otherwise whether CPL8 (WM version) supports directional safety camera warnings like NNG iGO8.3. If so, is the format the same as iGO8.3 ie. X,Y,TYPE,SPEED,DIRTYPE,DIRECTION. There is no ALK support for Australian safety cameras, so I've tried editing my safetycam file to include the directional info, but it doesn't work. Can someone enlighten me please. Thanks N |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15388 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
it uses a different format. if you subscribe to our database you will be able to get the australia database in the correct format.
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FrequentFlyer Lifetime Member

Joined: Jun 12, 2006 Posts: 964 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:48 pm Post subject: Re: CPL8 - Directional Safety Camera Warnings |
|
|
nonno wrote: | Hi, can someone confirm or otherwise whether CPL8 (WM version) supports directional safety camera warnings like NNG iGO8.3. If so, is the format the same as iGO8.3 ie. X,Y,TYPE,SPEED,DIRTYPE,DIRECTION. There is no ALK support for Australian safety cameras, so I've tried editing my safetycam file to include the directional info, but it doesn't work. Can someone enlighten me please. Thanks N |
Without taking anything away from the efforts of PGPS, for heavens sake, do not rely on the database...be extremely careful. Having spent 3 months touring around...trust me, there are many, many cameras not listed. I gave up trying to log them in the end as my wife was getting on to my case..'we're supposed to be on holiday...not keep stopping for stupid cameras, etc. etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nonno Occasional Visitor

Joined: Feb 01, 2008 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the reply FF. No disrespect to PGPSW either, but its readily apparent from the submissions map that the AU database is nowhere near up to date (it would be unreasonable to expect that it would be). There are a couple of AU sites that provide regular updates of speed camera information (at no cost I might add) however, none are including the speed and direction information. I see this as a cooperative service rather than a fee for service type, especially since most of the information is freely available anyway. I just thought that some cooperative might just give me some pointers on how to update the files to include this extra information. I didn't think I was asking for something for nothing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you take time out to report some missing AU cams and add directional data to existing ones, you will not only improve the quality of our AU database but will probably be up for a lifetime free subscription.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FrequentFlyer Lifetime Member

Joined: Jun 12, 2006 Posts: 964 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure why PGPSW would not want to try and 'do a deal' with other such similar organisations in far away places, and offer each others databases. It would be easy to add a rider..'no guarantees etc.' How else are you ever going to be able to offer a reasonable, and up to date system which we would all like to rely upon to some degree.....probably better not to offer Australia, as an example, at all at present. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15388 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
FrequentFlyer: if we don't offer any database at all then how do we get a userbase to get the new cameras logged?
'doing a deal' DOES sound like a good solution and we have approached different sites without much coming from them. most reject it as we a a commercial service and they won;t give their data to us for us to charge for it.
the uk database started in the same way - basically we're just playing catchup with the non-uk countries. this is why we offer a free lifetime subscription to ANYONE who submits a single camera that gets confirmed/verified. this offer is for anyone whether they have a subscription or not. so if someone submits a handful of australian cameras which get confirmed then they get free access to the database for life - at no cost whatsoever.
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15388 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
nonno wrote: | its readily apparent from the submissions map that the AU database is nowhere near up to date |
have you submitted the missing cameras? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FrequentFlyer Lifetime Member

Joined: Jun 12, 2006 Posts: 964 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MaFt wrote: | FrequentFlyer: if we don't offer any database at all then how do we get a userbase to get the new cameras logged?
'doing a deal' DOES sound like a good solution and we have approached different sites without much coming from them. most reject it as we a a commercial service and they won;t give their data to us for us to charge for it.
the uk database started in the same way - basically we're just playing catchup with the non-uk countries. this is why we offer a free lifetime subscription to ANYONE who submits a single camera that gets confirmed/verified. this offer is for anyone whether they have a subscription or not. so if someone submits a handful of australian cameras which get confirmed then they get free access to the database for life - at no cost whatsoever.
MaFt |
I understand that, but, Australia I would suggest, is going to be a total uphill struggle, (and is it really worth the effort ??)...particularly as you need all camera sightings verified as well. Next time I go, I need to find out if all camera positions are 'Public Domain', in which case I think it would be sensible to just get them all uploaded and at least then we would all be in with a fighting chance ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15388 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FrequentFlyer wrote: | I understand that, but, Australia I would suggest, is going to be a total uphill struggle, (and is it really worth the effort ??)...particularly as you need all camera sightings verified as well. |
a few submissions of the same information at the same location verifies a camera.
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PhilB Lifetime Member

Joined: Nov 26, 2004 Posts: 83
|
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to get back to the subject of this thread which is directional cameras - has anyone else with the WM version running on a PDA seen warnings but no camera icons? I've just done a short trip down the M6 J18 to J16 then along the A500 to Stoke and there were a couple of instances where the warning came up but no icon another location that comes to mind is on the M5 south (in fact it's in both directitons) there's a mobile site on the bridge just before Frankley Services and I see the warning but no icon. Think I may experiment by taking the directional info out.
Cheers
Phil |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wiggo Lifetime Member

Joined: Mar 02, 2006 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phil,
I'm pretty sure what you're describing is a 'feature' of CoPilot. If you look at the 2D view, I can pretty much guarantee they'll all show, but in 3D they are somewhat more variable... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BaggieBoy Lifetime Member

Joined: Apr 13, 2005 Posts: 193
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have this too, only since the latest CP8 update (or perhaps the one before). Travelling along the A31 (Hogsback) there are several mobile sites, some show icons, some don't. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
PhilB Lifetime Member

Joined: Nov 26, 2004 Posts: 83
|
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wiggo wrote: | Phil,
I'm pretty sure what you're describing is a 'feature' of CoPilot. If you look at the 2D view, I can pretty much guarantee they'll all show, but in 3D they are somewhat more variable... |
Hi Wiggo,
I'll have a look at that. I took the direction off the site at Frankley and it has shown up in both directions not sure about the site on the M6 will have a look on Sunday night when I head south. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|