View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PaulB2005 Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 04, 2006 Posts: 9323 Location: Durham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
PaulB2005 wrote: | Loaded first time with no error messages.
Most of the changes i've submitted multiple times are now on the maps and don't need adding! |
Comment now withdrawn. Weird. When i first started up i checked a local junction. All the corrections to traffic direction where there. However once i drove to it they disappeared and 90% of the corrections need adding again.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
p60 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Apr 09, 2007 Posts: 19 Location: Plaistow London
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the juntion on A13 with A112 in London which was completed about 7 years ago is now correct,never thought I would live to see the day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14902 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The A350 at 51.07884, -2.16784 is STILL wrong. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Matt865 Regular Visitor
Joined: Dec 30, 2006 Posts: 92
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Matt865 wrote: | I have my Western_and_Central_Europe_2GB update now. On first glance they do appear to have included a few of the changes I made... |
I'd like to take this back now. None of the changes have actually been integrated into the map, the corrections I made were just carried over during the update. I reinstalled my map manually today and noticed all my corrections were lost, so I had to do them all again. Roads that don't exist, turn restrictions, inaccurately mapped roads etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stuart Frequent Visitor
Joined: 20/04/2003 11:51:10 Posts: 405 Location: Dorset, England, Great Britain
|
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:40 pm Post subject: Map error on A350 |
|
|
DennisN wrote: | The A350 at 51.07884, -2.16784 is STILL wrong. |
I've given up reporting this one Dennis. It's even wrong on Google Maps aswell. http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl
Previous attempts by other TomTom users can send you via the village of Hindon, which isn't much use. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldboy Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Dec 08, 2004 Posts: 10643 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:29 am Post subject: Re: Map error on A350 |
|
|
Did you mean Here? _________________ Richard
TT 910 V7.903: Europe Map v1045
TT Via 135 App 12.075: Europe Map v1140 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stuart Frequent Visitor
Joined: 20/04/2003 11:51:10 Posts: 405 Location: Dorset, England, Great Britain
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:32 am Post subject: Re: Map error on A350 |
|
|
Oldboy wrote: | Did you mean Here? |
Yes Richard, that's the place, north of East Knoyle, i the satellite view it is clear to a blind man where the main road runs...To the east.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xda Lifetime Member
Joined: Mar 11, 2004 Posts: 1199 Location: Park Gate
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
falkirk81 wrote: | NOT Europa!
Map folder name is 'Europe'. In that folder, files named :-
Europe.pna
Europe-80.meta
Europe-80.meta.dct
Hope this helps clear up the confusion! |
Just Downloaded the Europe_2GB, that has installed itself to a folder on the 720 named Europe_2GB which contains:-
Europe_2GB.pna
Europe_2GB-114.meta
Europe_2GB-114.meta.dct
The Map is V840.2568 and covers Western & Central Europe including Russia etc. _________________ Graham.
TT Go720, App:9.510(1234792.1) OS:842337
GPS: V1.20, Boot: 5.5279, Home: V2.9.5.3093
Map: Europe V910.4892
Map: Europe_Truck V870.3421, Kingston 8GB SD
Nokia 925 Windows 8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14902 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For interest, TNT pay me loaded mileage from pickup point to destination AND they specify what miles they'll pay. I've been arguing with them for some time now, because they always come up with less mileage than I do. I have at last found out that they use Navteq Shortest Route, equivalent of TT shortest too. So I've started doing that and to heck with any ideas they may have about when it's going to get there.
But this is throwing up loads of map errors - the maps simply don't take proper account of unsuitable roads. At least, the latest maps don't. My older maps (v675) have all those little back unsurfaced tracks dotted out as un-navigable, but the new maps don't. Yesterday I did a pickup from a farm business park in a village near Stonehenge and was then directed to turn onto a track which might well have landed me amongst the druids, provided I didn't get hung up on the centre line with wheels in tractor wheelruts! (51.18780,-2.00857) On Tuesday, I ended up going to Christchurch through an unsurfaced road which had so many potholes I feared for my suspension. Sure, I could have turned back and gone on a lovely tarmac road more than 5 miles longer at my own cost, but instead I chose to drive very carefully down this track. If the new map was as good as the old map, I would not have been placed in that position. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|