View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TomDavison Lifetime Member
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 Posts: 384 Location: Bedford, England
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:29 pm Post subject: Confusion over how TT calculates routes. |
|
|
Hi,
I asked my TT 730T to take me from Bedford to Helston (Cornwall) avoiding motorways. It warned that there was a toll on the route, and asked if I wanted to avoid it. I said no and was given a route 310miles, taking 6hr 18min. Out of interest, I then asked it to avoid the toll, and was given an alternative that was 304miles, and 6hr 2 mins. I had always assumed that it would go first for the fastest route, avoiding motorways, but clearly it doesn't do that. Any ideas why not? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How interesting. I've just done the same with my 920T, using city centres and I got similar results.
Do not avoid Toll = 308, 6:14.
Avoid Toll = 301, 5:58. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like a bug to me!!
Will pass it on... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pocketgps Lifetime Member
Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Posts: 2145 Location: Midlands, UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just tried that on a TT ONE v4 - 815 map
Do not avoid Toll = 311, 6:32
Avoid Toll = 311, 6:32
The ONE v4 does not show any difference between use Toll or avoid Toll
Shortest route = 286, 8:53 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you asking it to avoid motorways first? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldboy Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Dec 08, 2004 Posts: 10643 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
My 910 and 825 Map, going from/to City Centre doesn't even mention a Toll!
It gives 6:54 hrs - 311M
But then it always overestimates the journey time. _________________ Richard
TT 910 V7.903: Europe Map v1045
TT Via 135 App 12.075: Europe Map v1135 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldboy wrote: | My 910 and 825 Map, going from/to City Centre doesn't even mention a Toll!
It gives 6:54 hrs - 311M
But then it always overestimates the journey time. | Which reminds me that I forgot to say - It shouldn't mention a toll, because it's reporting the Tamar Bridge on the A38 at Plymouth, which is toll one way only (return journey)! _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jpg1 Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 20, 2009 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talking of toll charge warnings, my TT Go 530 tells me there is a toll road on my route whenever I plan a journey going through the central london congestion charging zone on a Sunday afternoon! Surely it knows when the congestion charge applies and when it doesn't? Especially when there is no chance the journey being so long that I might not get into the zone until the next Monday morning...?
There doesn't seem to be any "intelligence" in the TT systems regarding when a toll charge might apply and when it clearly would not!
Thoughts anyone?
J-P |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulB2005 Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 04, 2006 Posts: 9323 Location: Durham, UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suspect that any toll charge data would be built into the map data, like the IQ Routes data. SO if you have the latest maps with the latest toll charges all is well. However what happens if you have maps 12-18 months out of date and the times of the toll changed? You plan a route thinking the Toll doesn't apply and end up getting fined for non-payment!
At the end of the day your Sat Nav is a GUIDE and even then primarily for navigation. Important information such as tolls and their timings should be researched separately. Just like when people had paper maps. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jpg1 wrote: | Talking of toll charge warnings, ... SNIP ...
There doesn't seem to be any "intelligence" in the TT systems regarding when a toll charge might apply and when it clearly would not!
Thoughts anyone?
J-P |
Ho, Ho, Hoooo! And there are some people who think IQ Routes is valuable! They (and/or others) also think Mapshare Corrections are valuable too! Just goes to prove that TomTom can fool some of the people, all of the time. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
falkirk81 Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Jul 07, 2006 Posts: 1649 Location: Newcastle, England, UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Toll roads removal in Scotland has already been mentioned to the appropriate people. I would expect it integrated into map data sometime this year. _________________ Tomtom GO 1005 LIVE
iPhone 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
layingback Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 12, 2009 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
To the original problem, my guess would be that it uses the standard (TeleAtlas?) route selection with the appropriate user-specified criteria first, and then applies IQ to the best 2, 3, 5, whatever (but a small number) of routes (TT code?). Too hard any other way :-)
And as I suspect the toll road selection is in the initial route selection (as soon as it encounters a toll), the IQ analysis never gets to consider the toll route.
On the toll direction/time, I think PaulB2005 is correct, and built into the map it just isn't refined - or current - enough to do much more than declare "toll in one or more directions some or most of the time." _________________ Go Premium X / Go 1005 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
navver Regular Visitor
Joined: Dec 12, 2005 Posts: 111 Location: Chipping Sodbury
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My 520 with 8.10 map shows 6.1miles 3.01 hours using the A30.
Using IQ routes surely we will all get different results unless we all use the same departure time for the journey |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As far as I know, if you opt for "avoid motorways" it will not use IQ routes anyway.
I think IQ routes are only used for "Fastest" calculations. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|