View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
oisky Regular Visitor

Joined: 18/02/2003 15:38:44 Posts: 112 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:24 pm Post subject: TomTom start up time ? |
|
|
Just wondering how long everyones navigator takes to start up (completely load) from the secong you press the tomtom icon?
mine takes 31 seconds
I have navigator 3, with traffic installed and is runniong on an iPAQ 5550 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Talkingbollox Frequent Visitor

Joined: 14/10/2002 15:11:34 Posts: 439 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have assigned a hardware button on my 3870 running PPC2002 to start ChechPOInt 2.02 which starts TT3.
Pressing the button TT3 takes 11 seconds to appear.
I don't have traffic installed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oisky Regular Visitor

Joined: 18/02/2003 15:38:44 Posts: 112 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does the size of SD card and/or maps installed change the 'boot up' time I wonder? _________________ If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
iancjc Frequent Visitor

Joined: 10/02/2003 14:19:44 Posts: 749 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
30 seconds is about the norm with taffic - I went from 10 without to approx 25 seonds with traffic. _________________ -----------------------------------------------------------
TyTn II (WM6.1) / tomtom one v2
TTN6.03 tomtom 7.xx (one) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Taz Regular Visitor
![]()
Joined: Feb 22, 2004 Posts: 88 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
21 seconds for me.
iPAQ 5550 with traffic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MrT Frequent Visitor

Joined: Nov 14, 2003 Posts: 2146 Location: Surrounded by A1, M1 & M25
|
Posted: Mon Jun 07, 2004 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is dependant on if you are loading a 16MB or 100MB map. I bet many people load the whole UK map when they don't need it. Using the whole UK map mans longer loading, downloading traffic info for the whole of the UK instead of your local area at greater cost. It also seems to make the operational problems with the traffic install more likely to occur.
The 16MB maps cover a fair area with the London map covering London, Sussex, Kent, most of Essex and parts of Herfordshire, Bucks, Berks and Surrey.
Ipaq 5550 with 16MB London map (+traffic) ~7 seconds to load
Ipaq 5550 with 100MB UK map (+traffic) ~25 seconds to load |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
garygfx Occasional Visitor

Joined: May 30, 2004 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2004 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
TT3 loads in 12 seconds. I'm using an iPAQ 2210, 256mb SD with 64mb UK South map, TT Traffic, plus POI files for PocketGPS speed cameras, CheckPOInt speed cameras, POIhandler.com petrol stations and McD's and BK fast food.
I was going to grumble about 12 secs but from other posts this is clearly a very good startup time. I tried overclocking the CPU to 472mhz but it made no difference except when TT calculates routes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tom9851 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Feb 14, 2004 Posts: 283 Location: Warrington, Cheshire.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Between 8 and 10 secs without Traffic. _________________ ___________
IPAQ2210/ROM-1.10/LEXAR 32X 256MB SD/Kingston ElitePro 1GB CF
TTN3-V3.03/Wired GPS-V3.03/Globalsat BT-338 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bagmans911 Occasional Visitor

Joined: Mar 26, 2004 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
9 Sec for mine, TT3 Checkpoint etc. _________________ IPAQ 3970, Fortuna Clip-on BT, TT3, Lexar 32X 256mb SD card. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AndyR Occasional Visitor

Joined: May 17, 2004 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
According to Tomtom, this is due to the software having to reference TMC codes to the map. The larger the map, the slower the startup time. Tomtom are apparently working on a fix to speed things up.
Andy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|