View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
at94btinternetcom Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 09, 2006 Posts: 6 Location: N.E.Lincolnshire
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:14 am Post subject: A couple of my latest submissions not shown |
|
|
Apologies I posted this in another Forum then realised I should post it here:
Hi All
I recently submited several new locations (Grimsby Area)
2 Truvelo's and several mobile locations
On the new database released yesterday the mobile locations I submitted are now shown but the Truvelo's are still missing
Just wondered why this would be ?
Would I be right in thinking that the static locations need to be manually checked before they can be added but the nature of the mobile locations are difficult to check so they are added automatically ?
Thanks for any help
Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:07 am Post subject: Re: A couple of my latest submissions not shown |
|
|
at94btinternetcom wrote: | On the new database released yesterday the mobile locations I submitted are now shown but the Truvelo's are still missing
Just wondered why this would be ?
Would I be right in thinking that the static locations need to be manually checked before they can be added but the nature of the mobile locations are difficult to check so they are added automatically ? |
No, ALL sites are verified. Mobiles however become pMobiles until verified as these are very difficult to physically check. Fixed sites such as your Truvelo's are verified by a visit and whilst we endeavour to do this ASAP we can't guarantee a time scale. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
at94btinternetcom Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 09, 2006 Posts: 6 Location: N.E.Lincolnshire
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Many Thanks for the fast reply Darren
I understand now
Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15225 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
we've had a few of reports for the truvelo's but they are that spread out it's impossible to even guess a location for them yet!! hopefully a verifier will arrive shortly!
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
at94btinternetcom Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 09, 2006 Posts: 6 Location: N.E.Lincolnshire
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi MaFt
Pretty sure that my location report for the 2 Truvelo's is fairly accurate
I drove to them & parked in the camera service bay & stored them as poi's in the 70mph Gatso PGPSW file & navigated back to them just to check
[at least I have the warning on my SatNav until they are confirmed ]
I think the grey one is a bit out of order, very difficult to see especially when the light is failing, a bit like the famous one that used to be behind the road sign a few miles down the road at Caistor on the A46 that has been removed now
BTW: It has been proposed to reduce the speed limit as part of phase 2
http://lesbonner.mycouncillor.org.uk/2008/06/26/details-of-laceby-bypass-safety-scheme-announced/
Regards
Mark |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15225 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i'm pretty certain that each of the submitters believed there's to be accurate too!!
hence we wait for lots of submissions and/or a verifier!
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|