View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
if1977 Lifetime Member
Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 649 Location: Doncaster
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikealder wrote: | With a GPS speed of 70 mph I would expect the vehicles speedo to read between 70 to 77. What is not acceptable is for the vehicles speedo to read under the actual speed the vehicle is travelling at, so where you had a speedo reading of 70MPH and the GPS speed was indicating 75 the speedo is illegal - it is enticing you to break the law - Mike |
But the vehicles speedo is not reading under the actual speed the vehicle is travelling at as when the speedo on the car is saying 70mph the car is actually traveling at 66 mph so why is this tempting you to speed. _________________ NEW Tomtom GO 500 (hope it is good)
iphone (running all day, doesn't like it)
XL LIVE IQ Routes (Got stolen and miss it)
GO 510 (in drawer now, time for upgrade) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And where is the diagnostic machine getting this data from, the gearbox sensor which is related to wheel speed - I would still trust the GPS speed to be more accurate, it certainly won't be 11MPH out.
Unless your diagnostic speed was from a calibrated speed sensor - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tgold Regular Visitor
Joined: Nov 07, 2004 Posts: 98 Location: UK or USA from time to time.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tgold wrote: | As I understand it the legal tolerance is +0 and - (10% plus 10kph). So if a new vehicle travels at 70 mph and its speedometer reads anything between around 56.75 mph and 70 mph it would meet the legal requirements under the Construction and Use Regulation, now based on Community Directive 97/39.
Tony | Sorry, my wrong. The range is +0 to -(10% plus 4kph). So the lawful range of indications in that 70 mph vehicle would be from around 60.5 mph to 70 mph.
Ref: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/automotive/mvwg_meetings/meeting109/odometer_proposal.pdf
Tony |
|
Back to top |
|
|
if1977 Lifetime Member
Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 649 Location: Doncaster
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikealder wrote: | And where is the diagnostic machine getting this data from, the gearbox sensor which is related to wheel speed - I would still trust the GPS speed to be more accurate, it certainly won't be 11MPH out.
Unless your diagnostic speed was from a calibrated speed sensor - Mike |
The diagnostic machine gets its readings from an (Eprom) in the vehicles ECU which reads the perameters from all the actuators and electrical based components( inc speed sensor) in the engines management system. Allthough i to was a bit miffed at the difference also in the satnav if you are sure it is out Mike maybe there is somthing wrong with my satnav. Has there been a fault in the TT speed rating before. _________________ NEW Tomtom GO 500 (hope it is good)
iphone (running all day, doesn't like it)
XL LIVE IQ Routes (Got stolen and miss it)
GO 510 (in drawer now, time for upgrade) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Badgerman26 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Dec 03, 2007 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ruddy hell, just read this thread after starting it with what I thought was going to be a simple question!
I did try and use the search button but TBH it seems to come up with so many posts that are not relevant to the search terms (compared to other forums I use). Not sure if I am searching incorrectly?
Anyhow sorry to open a can of worms! _________________ TT Go 520
Fabia Vrs (Mine)
VW Golf (the wifes) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One line answer.... Trust the Satnav not the Speedo. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snudge Lifetime Member
Joined: Aug 22, 2007 Posts: 211 Location: Peterborough
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P2002 wrote: | Snudge wrote: |
1)Take a piece of string 1 metre long and make it into a circle to represent an inflated tyre and measure the circumference. (It's got to be 1 metre.)
2)Now make it into the shape of a flat tyre and measure the circumference.
Is there a difference? |
Obviously not, but that's nothing to do with the situation here.
what IS relevant is the effective radius of the inflated or deflated tyres.
When running on a deflated tyre the distance between the centre of the wheel and the road is smaller.
Imagine the extreme example of no tyre - running on the rims, and that certainly means a smaller circumference, doesn't it. |
It's got everything to do with it! My point is that for one revolution of the wheel the vehicle travels a distance equal to the circumference. It's nothing to do with the radius. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dhn Frequent Visitor
Joined: Oct 08, 2007 Posts: 2544 Location: Toronto CANADA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Snudge wrote: | My point is that for one revolution of the wheel the vehicle travels a distance equal to the circumference. It's nothing to do with the radius. |
Except Circumference = 2*pi*radius |
|
Back to top |
|
|
biggles150 Lifetime Member
Joined: Jan 09, 2006 Posts: 101 Location: Eltham, London
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P2002 wrote: | One line answer.... Trust the Satnav not the Speedo. |
Wot Andy said.....Forget all the geometry cr@p _________________ Go Classic
Application 7.163 (8493/71205)
OS:2328
GB Map v710.1571
Sandisk ultra II 512MB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Philgo Regular Visitor
Joined: Jan 02, 2008 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's face it, if the Satnav can't work out your speed accurately it's certainly going to struggle with it's proper job. I'd say that the satnav is probably accurate to a fraction of a mph. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jspencer Occasional Visitor
Joined: Dec 06, 2007 Posts: 30 Location: Brighton, MA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P2002 wrote: | One line answer.... Trust the Satnav not the Speedo. |
Absolutely true. If your Satnav has a good signal (meaning it is plotting your positions accurately), your speed averaged over, say half a mile, should be off no more than half a mph and probably less than that most of the time.
The math is pretty straightforward. The only way the Satnav will be off is if it has a weak signal and is getting bad position values.
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gnomeface Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 03, 2006 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
As an engineer, I can't let this go on without sticking in a few comments.
First, speedos on many (most?) modern cars are NOT driven from the gearbox output shaft (how ancient is that?) - the road speed is calculated by the car's computer from the data received from the wheel sensors that control ABS, DSC, etc, etc. The speedometer is then usually given an analogue signal (sometimes digital) which is generally higher to guarantee that it will not be illegal regardless of circumstances.
Second, different sizes of wheel options on a particular car model usually have different profile tyres, designed to give the same rolling radius so that there is no need for the manufacturer to adjust suspension or speedometer settings. The bigger the wheel, the lower the tyre profile that is normally fitted.
Third, in normal driving there's no way a tyre will be slipping or spinning on the road surface enough to affect the speedo, except during harsh acceleration or braking (when the speedo is inaccurate anyway).
Fourth, a flat tyre does have a smaller rolling radius and the circumference is effectively reduced because the tread is compressed and distorted within the (large) contact patch with the road. It is this continuous compression and release within the tread that generates large amounts of heat, destroying the tyre pretty quickly. The speedo will over-read by a small amount, not that you'd notice.
Fifth, tread depth is around 2% of a tyre's rolling radius and from new to bald can only affect the speedo by this amount.
Sixth, going down a steep (1 in 5, say) hill is likely to make your satnav show a speed that is too low (6% in this case) - possibly enough to get you a speeding fine if you rely on satnav rather than the speedo.
Finally, I've tested my own car's speedometer in several different ways, for example:
Using cruise control on flat straight motorway at a speedometer reading of 76mph:
Stopwatch timing between the motorway distance marker posts showed true actual speed as 70mph.
The TomTom showed the speed as 70mph - so the TomTom is accurate.
The car's computer trip readout stated 70-71 mph average speed - so the car's sensors are also pretty accurate.
The speedometer is obviously set to deliberately over-state the speed and I take that into account when using it. Pity that the "I'm doing the legal limit so I won't move over" outer lane hogs can't understand that their true speed is only 65.
So, that should have bored everyone to death. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tgold Regular Visitor
Joined: Nov 07, 2004 Posts: 98 Location: UK or USA from time to time.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
dhn wrote: | Snudge wrote: | My point is that for one revolution of the wheel the vehicle travels a distance equal to the circumference. It's nothing to do with the radius. |
Except Circumference = 2*pi*radius | I suggest you forget circular geometry and instead consider a tyre to behave much like a tank track. Each revolution will result in an equal distance of travel no matter what shape a tank track (or a car tyre) takes.
Tony |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
tgold wrote: | I suggest you forget circular geometry and instead consider a tyre to behave much like a tank track. Each revolution will result in an equal distance of travel no matter what shape a tank track (or a car tyre) takes.
Tony |
we're going to have to agree to differ on this one!
gnomeface wrote: | Sixth, going down a steep (1 in 5, say) hill is likely to make your satnav show a speed that is too low (6% in this case) |
No way 6%!
Right angle triangle 1 by 5 gives length of hypotenuse= sqrt26=5.099
Distance travelled is therefore 5.099/5 =1.02 x more than over flat ground, making speed error -2% (just under if you don't round up as much as I did). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jspencer Occasional Visitor
Joined: Dec 06, 2007 Posts: 30 Location: Brighton, MA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gnomeface wrote: | Sixth, going down a steep (1 in 5, say) hill is likely to make your satnav show a speed that is too low (6% in this case) - possibly enough to get you a speeding fine if you rely on satnav rather than the speedo. |
This is the only thing you said that I disagree with. You postulate a slope of 1 in 5, which is 20%. A 20% slope is 11.3 degrees (arctan(0.2)). Taking the cosine of 11.3 degrees, I get 0.9805806757.
100*(1.00 - 0.9805806757) = 1.94193243
or less than 2%.
Jon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|