View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
freedy50 Lifetime Member

Joined: Oct 22, 2005 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:54 pm Post subject: Changing cameras |
|
|
I heard a report on the radio today that all Gatso cameras that still use film are being converted to digital at a cost of about £10k each.
Anyone else heard this? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GPS_fan Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jan 04, 2007 Posts: 2789 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, I haven't heard this - but will it make much difference at the end of the day?
I would have thought that digital or film, you still get a fine and 3 points - although digital may just speed up the process of the envelope landing on your doormat _________________ Andy
PocketGPSWorld.com supports Help for Heroes - Read here |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15388 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think with film there is a higher chance of the film having 'run out' and no picture taken, but digital doesnt "run out"
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fanaloneman Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jul 19, 2007 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
There may also be an issue as to evidence a court will accept. Digital photo's are easy to tamper eg photoshop so some courts will not accept it.
I have have had 'photograhpic evidence' sent to me that 'may' have been tampered by making it darker making it difficult to count the teeth. Also there have been cases where number plates being blown up constitued 'tampering' as the number plate has to be clearly seen in full in the 'untampered photo'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JockTamsonsBairn Lifetime Member

Joined: Jan 10, 2004 Posts: 2777 Location: Bonnie Scotland (West Central)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fanaloneman wrote: | There may also be an issue as to evidence a court will accept. Digital photo's are easy to tamper eg photoshop so some courts will not accept it.
I have have had 'photograhpic evidence' sent to me that 'may' have been tampered by making it darker making it difficult to count the teeth. Also there have been cases where number plates being blown up constitued 'tampering' as the number plate has to be clearly seen in full in the 'untampered photo'. | The digital images are "watermarked" so that they can't be tampered with. _________________ Jock
TomTom Go 940 LIVE (9.510, Europe v915.5074 on SD & 8.371, WCE v875.3613 on board) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mikeact Frequent Visitor
![]()
Joined: Nov 29, 2004 Posts: 303 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Slightly OT, but, I do feel, that if this database is to remain the perceived No 1 in the UK, then all camera types should be easily identified in the download..even if that means larger files etc. Certainly, Truvelo's should be given a seperate listing at least. And if you don't do it, then I imagine that one of your competitors will. Innovation gentlemen...you can't afford to sit on your laurels just because you're No 1.....ask any business that's No 1...their biggest challenge is to stay in that position. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JockTamsonsBairn Lifetime Member

Joined: Jan 10, 2004 Posts: 2777 Location: Bonnie Scotland (West Central)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mikeact wrote: | Slightly OT, but, I do feel, that if this database is to remain the perceived No 1 in the UK, then all camera types should be easily identified in the download..even if that means larger files etc. Certainly, Truvelo's should be given a seperate listing at least. And if you don't do it, then I imagine that one of your competitors will. Innovation gentlemen...you can't afford to sit on your laurels just because you're No 1.....ask any business that's No 1...their biggest challenge is to stay in that position. | Since the camera types are clearly defined in the name of each camera, I'm presuming that you mean a download for each different fixed camera type, in the same way as we already have separate files for SPECS and Redlight? This wouldn't mean bigger files, in fact it would mean smaller files, but it would mean more individual files. This would probably cause problems for some SatNav systems, certainly TomTom v5 is limited to 39 POI files.
[Edit]
Re-reading your post and the above paragraph, I may have slightly misunderstood what you meant! The camera definition - and therefore its inclusion in the correct file, would be down to the submitter specifying the type correctly rather than just "there is a fixed camera at the following position".
[/Edit] _________________ Jock
TomTom Go 940 LIVE (9.510, Europe v915.5074 on SD & 8.371, WCE v875.3613 on board) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mikeact Frequent Visitor
![]()
Joined: Nov 29, 2004 Posts: 303 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, yes, I meant a down load for each camera...seperate files. I appreciate the TT limit, but I can then tweak what I want by camera type to suit...pretty easy really. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JockTamsonsBairn Lifetime Member

Joined: Jan 10, 2004 Posts: 2777 Location: Bonnie Scotland (West Central)
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mikeact wrote: | Sorry, yes, I meant a down load for each camera...seperate files. I appreciate the TT limit, but I can then tweak what I want by camera type to suit...pretty easy really. | As it is to tweak the existing files to get exactly the set-up you want  _________________ Jock
TomTom Go 940 LIVE (9.510, Europe v915.5074 on SD & 8.371, WCE v875.3613 on board) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|