View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bjornh Occasional Visitor
Joined: Feb 03, 2004 Posts: 28 Location: Sweden, Visby
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 2:47 pm Post subject: What’s the difference between MCX and MMCX antenna? |
|
|
Can anyone please explain the differnet between the MCX (use by Navman 4410) and the MMCX (used by Tomtom) for external GPS-antenn?
/Björn H |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's an excellent question. Here's what Google says
The MCX Family (MCX and MMCX) are snap-on 50 Ohm connectors similar to SMB that follow the European CECC 22220 standard. M/A-Com part OSX is equivalent to the MCX. Both MCX and MMCX are rated for 0 - 6 GHz operation. The MCX is about 70% of the size of an SMB (but not compatible with the SSMB) and is rated at about 250 V (max working voltage) and the MMCX is about 50% of the size of an SMB and rated at about 170 V max working. It appears the MMCX stands for Micro-Mate C. These connectors are designed to permit at least 500 interconnect cycles. _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bjornh Occasional Visitor
Joined: Feb 03, 2004 Posts: 28 Location: Sweden, Visby
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, you make it totally clear!
//Björn H |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GPSinC3 Lifetime Member
Joined: Dec 16, 2003 Posts: 135 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So what GPS receivers use what connectors, I assume the connectors are different not the technical specs. I have an ext aerial for a Globalsat BT 308 I think this is MMX.
I might be selling it, so helpful to know if there is a list, I can't see anything in the Comparision databases |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To be honest, we haven't figured it out ourselves yet. That's why it's not in the comparison database. Maybe you can help us collect the data. From the description it would be possible to identify them by measuring the diameter...
You meant MCX, right? :-) _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bjornh Occasional Visitor
Joined: Feb 03, 2004 Posts: 28 Location: Sweden, Visby
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's in the comparison database for BT-devices! There is two item:
External Antenna (MCX) (GPS Receiver)
most of the BT-GPS and
External Antenna (MMCX) (GPS Receiver)
used by Deluo, Leadtek, SysOnChip and Tomtom
//Björn H |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What I wanted to say is that the data in the comparison database is unconfirmed. So if you have one of these devices, and know exactly what connector ithas, feel free to tell us in the Comparison database forum _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|