View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lester_Burnham Frequent Visitor
Joined: Oct 17, 2005 Posts: 618
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trevf wrote: | Thanks Mat, I will pass the name onto the guy I am talking to, hopefully they can start pulling things together. |
Ironic, really, isn't it...
They being seemingly unable to communicate effectively, internally as a company over this, has effectively demanded an amateur user community to do it on their behalf...
Sometimes, life - it's odd. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trevf Regular Visitor
Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But at least we know what is happening!!! Lester_Burnham wrote: | trevf wrote: | Thanks Mat, I will pass the name onto the guy I am talking to, hopefully they can start pulling things together. |
Ironic, really, isn't it...
They being seemingly unable to communicate effectively, internally as a company over this, has effectively demanded an amateur user community to do it on their behalf...
Sometimes, life - it's odd. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mhb Regular Visitor
Joined: Dec 21, 2005 Posts: 155
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just a thought but as some of us (me included) seem to be using 2.90 without any problems, whilst others have had nothing but problems, I wonder if the updated Garmin Web Updater program is in any way involved here.
I suggest this in the light of my experience a couple of days ago whilst using it to upload a later update of operating s/w for my eTrex handheld unit. Although it was running v3.2 and the latest update is 3.3 on the Garmin website, Web Updater was firmly telling me that there was no update available.
On querying this situation with Garmin by phone I was told this problem can occasionally happen, although they did not know why and I was advised to install the update manually. This I did.
So, clearly there is at least one problem with the latest Web Updater and so I'm left wondering how its use (and which version of it) correlates (if at all) with the problems being experienced by many. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
matb Frequent Visitor
Joined: Mar 20, 2006 Posts: 258
|
Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mhb wrote: |
So, clearly there is at least one problem with the latest Web Updater and so I'm left wondering how its use (and which version of it) correlates (if at all) with the problems being experienced by many. |
i have both 2.31 dated 14/3 and 2.32 dated 20/3 on my pc.
i am led to believe that when 2.9 came out we were advised to use the latest, 2.32 version which i did.
problems were such i went back to beta 2.82, but problems showed when the new language upgrade crashed on me, as it did with others.
could this have been a warning ?
is someone prepared to run 2.9 uploading with both 2.31 then 2.32 then reporting back with the findings.
i would volunteer by my usage over the next few weeks would not do the test any justice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aitch2 Regular Visitor
Joined: Jan 22, 2006 Posts: 226 Location: South Coast, UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I certainly updated Webupdater to latest version before the Firmware - as one who's not experiencing probs with v2.90 - if that helps?
Aitch _________________ Find Somewhere Else 090407: www.marillion.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trevf Regular Visitor
Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aitch2 wrote: | I certainly updated Webupdater to latest version before the Firmware - as one who's not experiencing probs with v2.90 - if that helps?
Aitch | I think I updated fist but may be wrong.
I have rolled back to 2.7 then manually updated to 2.9 without the language patches and will test tonight. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trevf Regular Visitor
Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: 174
|
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trevf wrote: | Aitch2 wrote: | I certainly updated Webupdater to latest version before the Firmware - as one who's not experiencing probs with v2.90 - if that helps?
Aitch | I think I updated fist but may be wrong.
I have rolled back to 2.7 then manually updated to 2.9 without the language patches and will test tonight. | Tested and not really noticed any difference other than possibly a Short Screen Freeze (but that may have happened before).
Going to go back to the Web Updater Update for now, if anything it seems slightly better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mhb Regular Visitor
Joined: Dec 21, 2005 Posts: 155
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Trouble is that there are so many permutations here. For instance I manually deleted the previous version of Web Updater before downloading the new one. Did this make a difference? I'm running W98 SE. Did this make a difference?
There does have to be an explanation as to why apparently identical units seem to behave so differently in spite of running the same software (or should I say what ought to be the same software).
Hope Garmin are looking into all these possibilities! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
channeler Occasional Visitor
Joined: Feb 19, 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:08 pm Post subject: v2.9 |
|
|
Went online to update to v2.9 after getting the news email from Garmin. The new version of Webupdater installed first then 2.9.
I haven't had some of the problems that other people have mentioned ie: screen crashes, but I do find that turn warnings are far too early now compared to previous version especially the last voice prompt before a turn (though I don't always seem to get it now). I know that this might partly be personal preference, but I do find it confusing to now get the last voice prompt the turn before the one I need especially on a roundabout. The timing on the previous version worked great for me.
Paul |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BERT_UK Occasional Visitor
Joined: Sep 15, 2005 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used v2.9 for the first proper time yesterday and I have to agree with a lot of people the new voice prompt timing is terrible.
I was travelling through a small village with many roads leading off from the main road. When the i3 said to turn left it was really difficult to comprehend which actual turn it was trying to indicate without scrutinising the display.
The only time these new voice prompts seem to be better was on a motorway. The turn left at 0.2 miles when travelling at motorway speeds seems more useful as there is no ambiguity as to what turn you need to take and also gives you a final warning to get left for your junction.
I haven't had any problems with other glitches but the voice prompt changing is too severe. I think I'm going to go back to 2.7 and tell Garmin that the voice prompting is poor. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rodonn Occasional Visitor
Joined: Mar 21, 2006 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found the .9 upgrade caused the prompts to be late and, apparently, I rolled backward at junctions at about 5 feet a second (I think the chap behind me would have noticed, since we were in convoy at the time.)
Gone back to the .7 revision. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BigAl94 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Mar 10, 2006 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Version 3 is now available |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scoobydooby Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 19, 2006 Posts: 104
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BigAl94 wrote: | Version 3 is now available |
Well spotted, I only looked this afternoon and it was still showing 2.90, lets hope this one has addressed the issues that have plagued some units
Scoobs _________________ Tom Tom Go 510 (new model)
I'd be lost without it !! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aitch2 Regular Visitor
Joined: Jan 22, 2006 Posts: 226 Location: South Coast, UK
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Happen he's right, tha knows! 8)
Aitch _________________ Find Somewhere Else 090407: www.marillion.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rjbsec Lifetime Member
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Still have to select Country before starting off - don't see why they haven't made that a "Settings" option! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|