View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RGCS Occasional Visitor

Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 9:22 pm Post subject: Navman icn510 vs Tom Tom Go 300 |
|
|
After having my Navman icn 510 for about 8 months now I’ve found it very useful, and it’s got me out of trouble a few times. Yes there have been a few hick ups, but ways and means have got me through them and I have generally been pleased with the unit.
That was until I got my hands on a Tom Tom Go 300…
I’ve been testing this unit out for a week now and have been very surprised on how this fairs with the Navman.
The Go 300 was very user friendly with it’s menu system & more reliable for GPS signals, but what did surprised me the most was the Go 300 have much better coverage of the roads where I live & routes that I travelled. As for the Speed cameras I found this to be a doddle in loading in the Tom Tom compared to the Navman which does take some time.
My question is?
Are there going to be any new UK map upgrades for the Navman as I have counted at least 5 Major dual carriageways to be missing in my area. Where as the Go 300 have all of these roads.
Is the stability of the GPS going to improve?
And is there going to be an easier way to load in POI’s on the Navman system compared to the Tom Tom system.
I would like to point out that both units have the latest Software/Firmware versions on them.
Any comments would be much appreciated.
[/b] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ShirleyTempleLives Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jul 04, 2005 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This question of GPS signal failure on 510's must be a unit related problem because I always get a signal from switching on using the power on/off button on the front of the unit within a couple of minutes (I've never shut the unit down using the power switch on the rear and if the unit sits in my draw for a couple of weeks the power setting always shows 100%). I've travelled in various countries and have only ever lost a signal in tunnels. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Buxton Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 14/09/2002 20:56:18 Posts: 5231 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2005 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you name some roads which are on your GO300 that weren't on the 510? _________________ Tim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RGCS Occasional Visitor

Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Tim,
list of roads then..
A130, A120, A13, A127, A140,,
these are all major dual carriageways and are missing parts of these roads that have been built over 2/3 years ago.
Does this help.
What i dont understand is how comes the TomTom Go 300 has these and the icn 510 does not. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RGCS Occasional Visitor

Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
hello ShirleyTempleLives,
well all i can say is that you've been lucky,
i have spoken to Navman and the Retail out let where i purchased who have tested the unit out to which both said there is no fault with the product. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Buxton Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 14/09/2002 20:56:18 Posts: 5231 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
RGCS wrote: |
What i dont understand is how comes the TomTom Go 300 has these and the icn 510 does not. |
Possibly because the GO300 is newer than the iCN510 and therefore uses newer mapdata from TeleAtlas. _________________ Tim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RGCS Occasional Visitor

Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
well it does seem like Navman are falling behind with the rest of the competition thats out there. The Navman icn 520 is newer than the Go 300 and it uses the same maps as icn 510 (With the roads still missing) so thats no excuse. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
banger9365 Lifetime Member

Joined: May 30, 2005 Posts: 79 Location: wakey (uk)
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
them road number's are on my icn 520 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
banger9365 Lifetime Member

Joined: May 30, 2005 Posts: 79 Location: wakey (uk)
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i am using the maps that are 3.50 on my icn and the maps are different on the 510 and the 520 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
banger9365 Lifetime Member

Joined: May 30, 2005 Posts: 79 Location: wakey (uk)
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and there is not an edit button or ealse iwould have just posted once sorry |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RGCS Occasional Visitor

Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 21 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi banger9365
Do you know if the maps on the 520 are compatible with the 510? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Buxton Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 14/09/2002 20:56:18 Posts: 5231 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The maps by themselves will not be compatible. You would have to buy the complete SmartST 2005 update. As yet, no release date has been announced, nor any upgrade pricing details. _________________ Tim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
northbynorthwest Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jul 23, 2005 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tim Buxton wrote: | You would have to buy the complete SmartST 2005 update. As yet, no release date has been announced, nor any upgrade pricing details. |
When I spoke to Navman customer support a few days ago, I was told that the unconfirmed prices will be around £79 for one country and around £149 for Europe. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tim Buxton Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 14/09/2002 20:56:18 Posts: 5231 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was hoping that they might offer a competitive upgrade price for existing users at last, something they've only done on an ad hoc basis in the past. _________________ Tim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|