Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they are not watching you!

Dom

HERE LIES PND May it rest in peace.
Navigon 7310/iPhone Navigon&Copilot

I agree - Darren's 'the problem' lies in the motives and intentions of the information gatherer. If they are well intentioned then we should all support them tracking down or discouraging the 'ill-intentioned'. 'Free' societies and 'police/totalitarian states' both use similar surveillance techniques. But they have different views on what is legitimate and what isn't.

I can remember many years ago during the Yorkshire Ripper era, cars were being monitored going in and out of the red light districts - a perfectly legitimate exercise in my view, but a privacy-sensitive one none the less, requiring considerable tact when subsequently dealing with 'innocent' drivers.

David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)

You're absolutely right, we should all be concerned. A great cornerstone of our freedom is the right to a fair trial. The speed camera NIP always has the option of settling the matter by accepting the £60 fine and 3 points. They don't have to prove who actually committed the alleged offence. They don't issue any evidence unless you choose the court option. All very one sided. I know of many who's wives/girlfriends etc have taken the hit instead, to save the insurance premium hike. The prosecutors haven't got a clue how widespread this is. Some justice system!!!

Unfortunately the great british public just puts up with it and accepts the fine & points, and yet, if we all asked for the court trial, the justice system would grind to a complete halt. The financial cost to the state would be unsustainable.

Undoubtedly, many of the cases would be found not guilty. With a decent solicitor the 'evidence' would soon collapse. Simply asking them to prove beyond all reasonable doubt, the identity of the driver would be the first insurmountable hurdle.

Tomtom Go520, App 8.010, Map UK&ROI 810.1870

Hyprocrisy.

We "need" these cameras to save lives. They make our roads safer. The cost must therefore be largely irrelevant.

So if councils are scrapping them on cost grounds they are proving the sheer hyprocrisy of defending them by saving lives.

Yesterday (approx 6am) was a fatal crash on the M74 south of Glasgow. Why?? A few months ago another in the same area (caused by road rage and deliberate actions). But all is fine as the speed cameras will mean we require less policing.

I am sure those folk involved would have preferred more police on roads and to detect dangerous/careless drivers. (and drivers that try to cause death/a crash - per above).

I believe that there will be a day when the conservative Englishman will say ‘enough is enough’ and there will be widespread vandalism of these unwanted cameras to rid this green and pleasant land of this scourge.
Let us not forget that the English people are capable of revolting - remember the poll tax riots that were the end of Thatcher's career in government? The government was seriously rocked by the conservative Englishman who has a reputation for being reluctant to complain. What would have happened if the law had not been changed? When does a riot become a revolution? The people will follow if they have a leader and I don't know if Captain Gatso is still active but someone like him could start a serious campaign.
Napoleon once said "A picture is worth a thousand words" so look at this picture of London 1990 during one of the poll tax riots.
This building is on the corner of The Strand and Northumberland Avenue.

Darren,
Sadly you are a bit late to worry about the survellance network, it has been here a few years now. There is a national network of ANPR cameras that automatically record time, date and registration of ANY vehicle that passes them and stores this for up to five years. It is was set up by MI5 originally to track terrorists but now comes under the Police. It probably best known for catching the second vehicle in the Glasgow airport attack. The Cherokee that caught fire was accompanied and the ANPR network told the Police the second vehicle was on the motorway and it was intercepted. If a vehicle is reported stolen or involved in soemthing criminal as well as getting a track on it, they can also mine the accumulated data to see where it was & what it was doing before it came to their notice. There is a paper on the ACPO website about it and giving the official operation guidelines.

I am not aware of them using the SPECS cameras but in theory any camera capable of resolving a car number plate could be connected, after all ANPR is a computer image processing algorithm that could be applied to any suitable video feed.

The full list of ACPO policies is here

http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/policieslist.asp

They even have ANPR at all our council tips,sorry, Civic Amenity Sites, along with CCTV cameras. You are greeted on arrival with a display of your number. The two cars in front of me each had one digit wrong. 2 out of 3 wrong!

At least they've found a cure for paranoia. How can you believe every ones watching you when they definitely are.

Tomtom Go520, App 8.010, Map UK&ROI 810.1870

Just got back from Spain where I saw a couple of speed cameras with bullet holes in them. Obviously somebody was unhappy about speed surveillance. I beleive this is prevalent in the USA as well.

I am doubtful about speed cameras effectiveness, and they do alienate drivers against the police. I am more concerned about use of mobile phones and other attention diverting (and normally totally unnecessary) devices by drivers. Satnavs are a positive aid to safer driving, which cannot be said of many other devices people have in their cars.

Have a look at the U-Tube video link below - it's pretty graphic and may well make texting drivers think again about their nasty habit.


http://on221.com/2009/08/17/the-craziest-anti-texting-while-driving-psa-ever/

[Rant on] On a recent trip home I decided to see how many people I could spot driving with no seat belt on. For a 20 odd mile trip I managed to count about 15 cars with one or more occupants with no seat belt, including a mother and father with a child.

While all blame lies with them if anaccident occured, it is still selfish in that you would cirtainly feel a little guilty if you were the other party and someone died, and then what about their next of kin etc.

These were things that plod on the road delt with but the lack of presents seems to be becoming visualy obvious in peoples attitues on the road.

Does a camera give a ticket or stiff telling off to the non seatbelt wearer?
[Rant off]

Dom

HERE LIES PND May it rest in peace.
Navigon 7310/iPhone Navigon&Copilot