Well this time even the article notes that the "minimum width" sign isn't at the end of the road. The "unsuitable" sign is just a suggestion.

It doesn't help that celebrity Stobart drivers are shown going through these signs as if they don't apply to them laughing as they almost destroy property.

Gerry

Gerry
TomTom730T
Cameralert for Android
Brodit ProClip mount

The driver's employers said in his defence that he "had checked the road with customers".

Well, that's ok then, not his fault.

Len

Who on earth would think that a sign saying "no satellite navigation" would ever help this? If my satnav takes me somewhere I don't know, I'm not going to stop using it due to a sign! How about a more useful sign like "Satnav users: Beware narrow lanes".

But much more practically, it is time for some of those "arches" they use in car parks and the like for low ceiling warnings. Put up an arch, and have heavy chains hanging at the width of the narrowest part of the road. The lorry will clank like heck and the driver will have a practical means to get out of the situation. I can certainly imagine that if I'd driven a mile up a narrow lane I'd think hard about how I could ever reverse out safely when I got to a really narrow part. I'd just hope I could squeeze past - that's natural.

Oh, and would the chains damage cars? Well, make them plastic covered, but I'll bet any car that takes that lane will be scratched by the hedges anyway. If you can't drive through the gap in your car without being hit, you should reverse too.

I was in North Wales a couple of weeks ago and saw signs to say the road wasn't suitable for HGV using Satnav - never seen these signs before, but they are better than nothing. The problem is that they are advisory, not compulsory and if the signs are not sufficient at the start of the road, how is an HGV driver supposed to know until it's too late - reversing down a country lane may not be a safe or practical option.

The chains, as mentioned above, are a practical solution, as long as it also says how far up the lane that restriction applied - an HGV may only need to drive up the lane a short way to get to a destination well before the restriction.

We have a couple of signs near us that have gone up recently. It's a rectangular sign, blue background with a white truck and white arrow pointing to the side road. It has a red diagonal line through it. Clearly says 'no trucks' but as it's not in the highway code (that I can fine) it's not an enforceable sign...

However, with or without a sign they can still be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention. You've got to be pretty stupid to carry on driving down a narrow road in an HGV...!!

MaFt

These days, there are quite a lot of HGV drivers who can barely read English, so fancy signs which say don't go in here will be useless.

Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

Yeah, yeah. What's the International sign for "if you're driving an HGV, don't follow your satnav down here"? As opposed to the International sign for "don't follow your satnav down here, because the ferry at the bottom is pedestrian only"?

Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

A lot of farms that supply milk are down tracks that would frighten even the most hardened of car drivers. trust me, I know.

But I would never trust a customer that said it was ok to get to them, because they all say, "We get vehicles like yours in here all the time." and when the shit hits the fan they then turn around and say something completely different like, "Oh. I didn't realise it was that big."

A driver should always make his own physical check if he's unsure, and not rely on someone else's say so.

I think a lot of HGV drivers use sat navs that are intended for cars, but car sat navs try to take you down roads that are barely wide enough for a car anyway. Each time I go to visit my sister in Swanage my 550 tries to get me off the A38 down some very leafy/overgrown lanes. Same happens in the Cotswolds. So I'm used to having to make a quick evaluation of the route viability [then back out onto a busy main road]. So whilst I agree that the driver is responsible, I do think that sat nav maps are a little 'optimistic'.

I think the view here is that a sat nav cannot differentiate between roads, but I'm wondering if 'unclassified' roads could be excluded from routing? I know that some of them are perfectly OK, but I'd accept longer routes just for the peace of mind. Mind you some B roads are nerve tingling as well......

Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom