View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RobBrady Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 21, 2004 Posts: 2718 Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:15 pm Post subject: South West Ambulances Attend Almost 100 Wrong Addresses |
|
|
When an ambulance turns up at the wrong destination, it is often the satnav that is blamed. Figures just released appear to tell a different story.
Out of approximately half a million calls to The South Western Ambulance NHS Trust in 2013, only five errors where the ambulance was directed to the wrong location were attributed to satnavs.
Ambulances attended an incorrect address 94 times last year, but on 33 occasions the emergency service was given the incorrect details by the caller and 28 were due to call handlers.
A further 28 attendance errors were left unexplained.
Although five errors were blamed on satnavs, it does beg the question whether the figure was in fact higher when paper maps were relied on.
The trust, which is working to improve its systems, commented "Taking a 999 call can be very distressing and it can sometimes be very difficult to get the address for our call handlers. We're introducing refresher training. We are using some of the occasions where possibly an address has been inaccurate as a learning basis for our staff."
Source _________________ Robert Brady |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sussamb Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Mar 18, 2011 Posts: 4456 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder whether they work differently to others then? First thing that happens when you call our Control is that if you call from a landline the address automatically populates, so always best to use a landline when you can. I can't recall more than a couple of incidents in the last 5 years when I've been directed to the wrong address.
What is really more of an issue is that these days you don't often stay in your local area, so there's no local knowledge any more. That used to make a big difference in finding the locations that weren't correctly identified by satnav, or by the caller (particularly with RTCs) or enabled us to get there more quickly as we knew the shortcuts in 'our' area. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aj2052 Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 03, 2005 Posts: 1431 Location: Leics,UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
sussamb said: Quote: | What is really more of an issue is that these days you don't often stay in your local area, so there's no local knowledge any more. That used to make a big difference in finding the locations that weren't correctly identified by satnav, or by the caller (particularly with RTCs) or enabled us to get there more quickly as we knew the shortcuts in 'our' area. |
This has been a problem in Cornwall for many years ever since they transferred control from locally to Exeter I think about 15 yrs ago, Exeter was over 100 miles from where I lived and it was a regular issue, I am surprised its not been resolved but then the Air ambulance does a magnificent service in Cornwall and perhaps covers the failings of the road ambulance service. _________________ Moto G5s Plus, Sygic 17.4.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14892 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Ambulances attended an incorrect address 94 times last year |
Well, that's pretty good going out of half a million calls = correct addresses in 99.99982% (hastily add that I haven't checked that maths with Anita!). Isn't that better than "Kills 99% of all known germs"?
I consider my success rate quite brilliant, but I've had difficulty getting "there" quite a few times and with five in half a million, their satnavs are better than mine - in my half a million miles I've had more like 6 wrong directions. (Probably since TomTom started concentrating on Twitter and FaceBook ). _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|