Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
MacFixer, the iPhone, iPod, and iPad specialists
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Police policy on speeding - double standards?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Police policy on speeding - double standards?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:15 pm    Post subject: Police policy on speeding - double standards? Reply with quote

pocketgpsworld.com
A number of motorists have been issued with £30 fines after they were seen alerting other drivers to the presence of a speed trap by flashing their headlights.

In a week long sting, Lancashire Police caught 20 drivers flashing their headlights towards motorists approaching a mobile speed trap. All were fined for 'misuse of headlights'.

Police defended the fines claiming that speeding drivers needed to be spoken to about their actions and flashing headlights to warn them did not force a change in behaviour.

It's an odd statement when speed cameras can issue fines without recourse to 'having words with the driver', and many camera sites are equipped with warning signs that surely have the same effect as a motorist flashing a warning?

email icon

_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
253
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 05, 2007
Posts: 1058
Location: The green bit between the M40, M4 and M25.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flashing of headlights to warn drivers of police speed checks, is I believe a strange thing really.
Why don't people flash headlights to warn of 'fixed' speed cameras.
Is it because drivers already suspect 50% or more are inactive, or that because a human is at the camera there is a 100% chance that it is working? Or both? Or neither?

I've often wondered.
_________________
Triumph Tbird 1700. And now a Bonnie T100.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
geraint
Lifetime Member


Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: 194
Location: Dorset, UK.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Show's it's about money and/or keeping the numbers up so the statistics look good. Nothing to do with safety.
_________________
Geraint

TomTom for iPhone v1.9
App version: 8.300 (777309)
Map: Western Europe v875.3668
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrdecember
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Posts: 7
Location: Manchester

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 4:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Police have always maintained that the various camera locations are not there to make money but their very presence slow the motorist down to a safe speed. O K then surely motorist's warning their opposite number in the oncoming lane are doing the same job, slowing the vehicles down to a safe speed, aren't they? As you say, double standards. Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Guivre46
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Posts: 1262
Location: West London

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This keeps coming up. In order to penalise a motorist for warning other motorists, the police need to prove the other motorists were speeding. If they weren't there is no offence
_________________
Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Allan_whoops
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Posts: 369

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe I've overlooked something but who is to say that the motorists weren't flashing the other motorist for other reasons? Did anyone appeal this as I would have thought that the police still have to provide a burden of proof if it went to court.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15125
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Highway Code rule 110:
Quote:
Flashing headlights. Only flash your headlights to let other road users know that you are there. Do not flash your headlights to convey any other message or intimidate other road users.


If there were other users on the road then how can they be done for 'misuse of headlights'? The drivers were simply letting the other drivers know they were there. How else would they know?

If you take that Highway Code rule to it's logical conclusion then the only way you could be prosecuted for misuse of headlights is if there was no other user on the road. There's nothing in the highway code to say WHY you would need to warn other road users you are there, just that that is the only reason you can use them.

If it were me I'd fight it!

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 7037
Location: Reading

PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My car has auto headlights your honour. It must have decided that it was dark enough to momentarily turn them on or the system 'blipped'.

As it happens I would never flash another vehicle to warn them. If they can't obey speed limits, that's their lookout.
_________________
Satnav:
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Car Average MPG :
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jonrome
Occasional Visitor


Joined: May 06, 2006
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Auto headlights - thats inspired! I hate them anyway. I want to decide when to use lights not let lhave a dumb computer do it & frighten the driver behind who thinks I'm braking.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 7037
Location: Reading

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was using that as an excuse. I also have them turned off. I've heard of incidents where they have turned on unexpectedly and a driver waiting to pull out of a junction has done so.

Driving under a cover/tunnel of trees for example could be enough
_________________
Satnav:
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Car Average MPG :
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jonrome wrote:
I want to decide when to use lights not let lhave a dumb computer do it & frighten the driver behind who thinks I'm braking.
It's nice to know that there are some drivers around that are considerate enough to not only think about the effect on other drivers that switching on their headlights might have, but also the effect their their tail lights will have on following drivers. Shocked Yeah, right.
Kremmen wrote:
Driving under a cover/tunnel of trees for example could be enough
Then if it's dark enough for the computer to switch them on, then it's time they were on in order that other road useds can see you in the reduced visibility. That's why the EU brought in the new law that
Quote:
In 2008 a new law was passed by the European Commission that meant all new cars and small vans purchased after February 2011 had to have daytime running lights, and lorries will follow suit from August 2012.
My guess would be that they introduced it to overcome the fact that som inconsiderate drivers do not switch on their lights in times of reduced visibility.
And while I'm at it.
Quote:
There is also concern over {snip} the possibility of a rise in pollution due to increased fuel usage.
What a load of cobblers. Shocked
Quote:
LED´s use less watts (about 5-10) when running compared to headlamps which consume 110 watts. The difference in the amount of power used will have a big impact on the amount of fuel used.
Another load of cobblers. It won't, it will only have a tiny effect on fuel consumption. Rolling Eyes
Kremmen wrote:
I've heard of incidents where they have turned on unexpectedly and a driver waiting to pull out of a junction has done so
If you believe that, you'll believe anything Rolling Eyes And even if it has happened, it's the other driver's fault, as the only interpretation they should put on flashing headlights is one of warning.
Guivere46 wrote:
This keeps coming up. In order to penalise a motorist for warning other motorists, the police need to prove the other motorists were speeding. If they weren't there is no offence
You presumably have a reference to the legal precedent for this statement?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikealder
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2005
Posts: 19638
Location: Blackpool , Lancs

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT wrote:
You presumably have a reference to the legal precedent for this statement?


It has been in court before and was thrown aout as the Police couldn't prove if those warned by the flashing headlights were speeding or not:

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS v GLENDINNING (2005)

DC (Scott Baker LJ, Owen J) 13/10/2005

CRIMINAL LAW - POLICE - ROAD TRAFFIC

OBSTRUCTION OF POLICE : SPEEDING : WARNING MOTORISTS OF SPEED TRAPS : WARNING DRIVERS : ACTUS REUS OF OFFENCE

Where an individual gave a warning to motorists of the presence of a police speed trap, it was necessary for the prosecution to prove that those warned were either exceeding the legal speed limit or were likely to do so at the location of the speed trap for the individual to commit an offence of obstructing a police constable in the execution of his duty.


The appellant appealed by way of case stated against a decision of the Crown court that the respondent (G) had no case to answer to a charge of obstructing a police constable in the execution of his duty. Police constables had established a speed trap on a lay-by of a dual carriageway. The constables observed G making a slow-down signal with his hand to drivers behind him. G was subsequently convicted in the magistrates' court of obstructing a police constable in the execution of his duty. G successfully appealed his conviction to the Crown court, which held that the video evidence showed that none of the drivers were travelling in excess of the speed limit and that they had not reacted to G's signals by slowing down. Accordingly the Crown court held that G had no case to answer. The issue was whether, for there to be an obstruction of a police constable in the execution of his duty by warning others of the presence of a speed trap, it was necessary for the prosecution to prove that those warned were either exceeding the legal speed limit or were likely to do so at the location of the speed trap.

HELD: The actus reus of the offence could only be established where the prosecuting authority proved that those warned were either exceeding the legal speed limit or were likely to do so at the location of the speed trap. On the facts of the instant case it was clear that there was no actual obstruction by G, Bastable v Little (1907) 1 KB 59, Betts v Stevens (1910) 1 KB 1, Green v Moore (1982) 126 SJ 79 considered.


As for LED's saving fuel when fitted to a car I have seen such claims made by vehicle manufacturers, what I find incredible is that people can be led to believe such dross - Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Guivre46
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Posts: 1262
Location: West London

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:59 am    Post subject: Glendinning: High Court rules against DPP Reply with quote

Thanks Mike

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/2333.html

The only problem with leds is the cost of replacing the array when they fail!
_________________
Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom


Last edited by Guivre46 on Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:46 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dhn
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Oct 08, 2007
Posts: 2544
Location: Toronto CANADA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the "Wheels" section in the Toronto Star yesterday, July 15th:

http://www.wheels.ca/feature/can-i-get-a-ticket-for-flashing-high-beams-to-warn-drivers/
_________________
David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@Mike and Guivere.
Not relevent. The defendant here was waving a slow down signal with his hand not flashing his headlights
@DHN
Not relevent. Canadian law is not applicable in UK.

The cut and thrust of the OP was 'Misuse of headlights' not warning other drivers.

mikealder wrote:
As for LED's saving fuel when fitted to a car I have seen such claims made by vehicle manufacturers, what I find incredible is that people can be led to believe such dross - Mike
What I find incredible is that the ASA havn't jumped on them and told them to stop telling lies. I suppose it depends on how you define 'big impact'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.034 (27 Mar 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping