Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - 1005 HD Traffic USELESS (and now older models too!)
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

1005 HD Traffic USELESS (and now older models too!)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 25, 26, 27  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> TomTom Portable Navigation Devices
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AndyVaughan
Lifetime Member


Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Posts: 1500
Location: Rossendale

PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

All because their servers can't cope!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guivre46
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Apr 14, 2010
Posts: 1262
Location: West London

PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Presumably in fairness they will be reducing the HD traffic subscription by 25% ?

Rolling Eyes
_________________
Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AndyVaughan
Lifetime Member


Joined: Apr 13, 2006
Posts: 1500
Location: Rossendale

PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guivre46 wrote:
Presumably in fairness they will be reducing the HD traffic subscription by 25% ?

Rolling Eyes


That would be typical TT - reduce the range by 50% and the cost by 25% Grrrr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Tue Aug 02, 2011 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I DON'T WANT a reduced subscription. I DON'T WANT a reduced service. I bought my first subscription when it was £80 for the year and worth it for the Traffic and Google Search (although I'd have happily accepted a refund on the cameras, Help Me Find a Police Station 200 Miles Away and the fuel prices!).

I want the full service I paid for. Evil or Very Mad
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spook51
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 26, 2004
Posts: 548
Location: East Midlands

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not a frequent TomTom user but I do need it to be as accurate as possible when I do so, in the six months or so that the Traffic data range has been reduced, how has it affected those who use it day in, day out?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

spook51 wrote:
I'm not a frequent TomTom user but I do need it to be as accurate as possible when I do so, in the six months or so that the Traffic data range has been reduced, how has it affected those who use it day in, day out?

Well, I thought pottsy, AndyV and I had already mentioned it.

In my own case, I go wherever I'm sent, "four corners" of UK from Bristol.

If I'm, at home before I set off, it might be possible to have a quick look at the TT online Traffic situation, but TBH, when I get a call, it's sameday delivery and they want me on the road, not fiddling with my computer at home. So the traffic situation interests me from the TomTom Live device. Generally, there are optional routes for me - even London has the choice of M4 or M40. So advance warning of a bit of nastiness is very useful to choose an alternative route.

If I'm already out on the road, maybe I could look at the TT Traffic site from my iPad, but once again, they want me moving along, so the Live TT is the proper solution.

If I'm going some distance (and I hate short trips which are not cost effective/profitable), there is usually a choice of routes. The problem with TT device is it's a computer - fastest route means exactly that, whether by one minute or one hour, so it will plan me accordingly. So is shortest route (hence examples of people being directed off and on at junctions, in and out of laybyes). With my less than perfect mind, I can sometimes spot these things and ignore the TT. Having long range Traffic Service allows me to override the TT for a minimal difference journey - I do that constantly - I have three devices in my van and invariably choose to go the shortest of the fastest routes offered - ten miles makes the difference of a litre of diesel, but nobody will notice quarter of an hour's difference in my delivery time. A traffic jam is equally unattractive.
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spook51
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 26, 2004
Posts: 548
Location: East Midlands

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me put this a different way for you Dennis. When you were at the wheel, did you notice any deterioration in route planning during the six months to July 25th?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Somewhere back in the sands of time (about February when we were first muttering about this problem?) I posted a report about a trip where the Live 550 did not report a traffic problem when I set off, whereas my RDS-TMC devices did ("There is a closed road on your route"). The 550 was directing me along my preferred route to the lower M25 - M4, A329M, M3, where the others were directing me to M4/M25. It did eventually pick up the CLOSURE of M3 (which lasted all day), but only when it was about 50 miles away. My destination was Dungeness, with a (not very fast) alternative route down to Southampton, then A27 eastwards - I might have chosen that if I had bad incidents on M3 and M25, but that means A36 from Bath (A34 from Newbury is 35 miles - 3 litres - extra). Note, I'm in a badly paid business - a 200 mile delivery earns me £100, but costs me £75 - 3 litres makes a difference! Mind you, if the 550 tells me there's a baddy on the way and I'll need to divert, maybe I could tell my customer and negotiate for the extra mileage?

Of course, one problem with the Live devices is they plan, but then scan for problems and re-plan before giving you a finished route, so if they do take account of incidents, you may not hear about them. This is one reason why I'm grateful to have RDS-TMC on my other devices - I can (quickly because of the faster re-draw time) look at the route on them to see how they differ from the Live device.
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As for noticing deterioration, that's difficult for me - different destinations daily, unlike pottsy's steady commute.

My once-in-a-lifetime best ever trip into central London was 5 hours round trip. Last Friday it took me 9 - earned me £70, cost £55!
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spook51
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 26, 2004
Posts: 548
Location: East Midlands

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Dennis. Reason I asked is that I make the same 200 mile journey frequently and I imagine you're on different routes all the time. I follow what TT tells me on the grounds I'd rather keep moving than sit in traffic and I reckon I now know all the rat runs around the NE section of the M25.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JohnMulholland
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 32
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another problem with the short range of HD Traffic, and the reason why increasing the range to 120km (~75 miles) is not sufficient, is that the ETA is badly affected. If I'm likely to be an hour late for a meeting, I like to be able to warn the other attendees that I may be late.
_________________
John
1005 Live
App: 12.071
Map: Europe v925.5413
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing I could have done with you when I tried my sense of direction to duck and dive around North Weald and ended up inside the business end of the ex-RAF base on market day (it was my first posting in the RAF in 1958, so I was tempted - didn't know it was one way in and out, but behind everything else for miles!).
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
matthewj
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Apr 03, 2006
Posts: 751

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it worth saying that there is a response from TomTom at http://discussions.tomtom.com/t5/LIVE-Services-HD-Traffic-and/HD-Traffic-range-now-reduced-for-ALL-Tomtoms/td-p/61691/page/7 where they say they are changing it.

I hope it is okay to quote a bit here.

Quote:
Quick update – we’re currently having management meetings to define the fastest and best solution. Needless to say, we need to implement something that doesn’t create more problems down the line.

Our first action will be to increase the range from the current 80km to 120km. Going directly back to the original 160km range is not feasible due to the much greater detail and volume of incidents we now provide with HD Traffic 5.0 and multiple new data sources. We are currently testing this increase to 120km and if all goes well it will be live on Thursday afternoon (4th August).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

matthewj wrote:
I think it worth saying that there is a response from TomTom at http://discussions.tomtom.com/t5/LIVE-Services-HD-Traffic-and/HD-Traffic-range-now-reduced-for-ALL-Tomtoms/td-p/61691/page/7 where they say they are changing it.

I hope it is okay to quote a bit here.

Quote:
Quick update – we’re currently having management meetings to define the fastest and best solution. Needless to say, we need to implement something that doesn’t create more problems down the line.

Our first action will be to increase the range from the current 80km to 120km. Going directly back to the original 160km range is not feasible due to the much greater detail and volume of incidents we now provide with HD Traffic 5.0 and multiple new data sources. We are currently testing this increase to 120km and if all goes well it will be live on Thursday afternoon (4th August).

To which our reaction is as stated by JohnMulholland, not good enough, plus we want it back to what we paid for and what they appear to advertise, whole journey. - Y'know, the ad says stuff like "Get there on time, no hassle, no traffic jams" - that means they are doing the traffic business all the way there, doesn't it? That's how I and so many others bought it. IO mean, if I'm going from here to Glasgow or Edinburgh, I expect them to do the traffic thing for over 350 miles, not just to Gloucester or even Birminghham!
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 7039
Location: Reading

PostPosted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The TomTom page in the new Argos catalogue shows how HD traffic works and gives the impression that it covers the whole journey.

The journey shown is well into 2 hours but I can't determine the mileage.
_________________
Satnav:
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Car Average MPG :
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> TomTom Portable Navigation Devices All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 16, 17, 18 ... 25, 26, 27  Next
Page 17 of 27

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.043 (17 Apr 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping