View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kblackburn Occasional Visitor
Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Posts: 39
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:40 pm Post subject: mobile speed camera van m6 north bound lancaster |
|
|
Hi,
just a word of warning, mobile speed camera van on Halton bridge, north bound from lancaster.11.20pm. last night, working with 2 patrol cars on motorway.
kev |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:45 pm Post subject: Re: mobile speed camera van m6 north bound lancaster |
|
|
kblackburn wrote: | Hi,
just a word of warning, mobile speed camera van on Halton bridge, north bound from lancaster.11.20pm. last night, working with 2 patrol cars on motorway.
kev |
Have you submitted a report using the "Submit Cameras' page? _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quite often a camera van used in conjunction with patrol cars is actually ANPR looking for cars without Tax, Insurance, MoT or any other outstanding offence, generally in Lancashire the speed camera vans operate solo - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah yes, missed the reference to accompanying cars. In that case it will almost certainly be ANPR which we support. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Darren wrote: | Ah yes, missed the reference to accompanying cars. In that case it will almost certainly be ANPR which we support. |
Possible confusion here. We support the USE of ANPR cameras, we do NOT support them in the PGPSW database, because we think they are a good thing. Anyway, how could you use the information of the possible location of ANPR. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | Possible confusion here. We support the USE of ANPR cameras, we do NOT support them in the PGPSW database, because we think they are a good thing. |
Yes, thanks for clarifying, that is what I was trying to say .... badly!
Quote: | Anyway, how could you use the information of the possible location of ANPR. |
I'm sure there are some who would choose to travel quite some way to de-tour around an ANPR site _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Darren wrote: | I'm sure there are some who would choose to travel quite some way to de-tour around an ANPR site |
I must remember to engage my 'illegal' brain first. I suppose you could be right |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|